coming. was it prop gan it s a long simmering dispute that leads to workplace shootings. they have not heard of anything like that, did not recall anything like that. the motive question is still unclear. it has aspects of both. both inspired juhadist style terror attack and workplace dispute. the first narrative was he stormed out and was angry.
viewers should understand is that the one real resource that the united states, france, all the countries that are targets have in this fight is their ability to see what s coming at them through surveillance and through the use of modern technology. because of new encryption schemes, the juhadist are smart and know the latest app and latest thing to go after and the message about put this on your phone. a lot of that has been lost and i think going forward, the issue for silicon valley will be when there s a lawful order from a court in counter terrorism and investigation where they need information, today it can be impossible to get it because the encryption is so strong. they re going to have to figure out a way where the court says it s in the country s interest to turn this over. there s got to be a way to get that. is there a back door? a different system?
foc focus and tend to overshadow the policy and campaigns on the trail. here s how the candidates responded when they were asked to characterize the threat posed with like-minded terrorist around the world. you mentioned radical juhadist. i don t think we re at war with islam. i don t think we re at war with all muslims. i think we re at war with juhadist. he just said radical islam. is that a phrase you don t i think you can talk about islamist who are clearly also juhadist. it s not helpful to make the case that senator sanders was just making i agree with we got to reach out to muslim countries and have them be a part of your coalition. very quickly, do either of
are we ready? about as well as we can be. you can t stop it all. we stopped so much. the foreign fire threat is what happened in paris. these are individuals. there s 5,000 of them in europe that travelled to the region train very artfully in the skill of terrorism warfare, came back to perpetrate this action. we have thousands in europe. it s a visa waiver with countries in western passports. we also have hundreds of americans that have travelled to the reese agion and come back a well. we have these very young sophisticated cyber juhadist that are smart in terms of how they can radicalize people in the united states to attack military. just like what we saw in chattanoo chattanooga. this was a different deal in paris. this was the fortune fighters trained with suicide vest and
you use that phrase? i don t think the term is what s important. what is important to understand is we have organizations whether it s isis or al qaeda who believe we should go back several thousand years and make women third class citizens that we should allow children to be sexually assaulted. that they are a danger to modern society and that this world with american leadership can and must come together to destroy them. we can do that. the critiquing is the softness of language betrays a softness of approach. if this language, if you don t call it by what it is, how can the approach be effective to the cause? that s the critique. i believe calling it like it is is radical juhadist. let s not fall in the trab thinking all muslim american