some details on the feinstei dilemma. so, peter, when the main power you have with the senate majority - is confirming judges feinstein sits on the judiciar committee and without her we can t advance judicial nominee for a full vote. she has been out since early march so therefore nominee have - replaced on the committee, recently did, that republicans need to agree to that. and they refused to. so right now it is a littl stop steve asks, as a skilled professional communication representative, thank you steve, can you break down why facts care to much about not agreein to acknowledge they lied as an organization, even thoug anyone can report that they di line also report they don want to say so on their ow network? i think you answered prett your question there steve. but remember, this all started because they didn t want t upset their viewers with the truth. not much has changed they don t want to tell thei viewers. so for them, they have made th calculation that throwing mone at th
efforts you are watching tha you think could actually advance and augment rights o the legal front? i do think that the efforts at preemption could events right on the legal front, bu to your point, where we ar right now is that we hav republicans controlling th house, and we have a firml conservative, not only a supreme court but a judiciar that in many respect transformed by donald trump. matthew kacsmaryk is proof positive of how even a singl apartment in a district cour can really wreak havoc wit peoples lives. in some respect, felicia, that is where we are right now, and if folks want to see tha change, we say all the time, elections have consequences. we are living with a lot of those consequences right now chris geidner, as always, than you for being with us. lisa, you are staying with me. next, another donald trump cas goes to trial this tuesday whether he testifies, even shows up, that is anyone s guess. plus, a string of shooting where the victims were simpl
even one republican could block it from happening, and that would require a much lengthier process of which he would still need 10 republicans to cross over and vote with democrats there are at least four of these judicial nominees that have been bottled up in the judiciar committee who are considered to be highly controversial, and would need all the democratic votes to get over the threshold, so the idea that republicans are just going to go along with this replacement plan without any kind of negotiation i think, chris, is a bit of a fantasy for democrats. we re going to have to see how this all plays out next week. how big of a conundrum is this for democrats, chuck schumer in specific, feinstein is a progressive icon. she s been a trail blazer. how do you balance that against the fact that frankly her absence is a problem in a 50/50 senate yeah, i think it s notable that it s a lot of younger progressive voices who don t have that reverence for senator feinstein that are very
just on this issue, but th fact that the republican turned their backs with th majority of our people, whic is abortion access and they re also turning their backs on gun safety legislation, so that the young people in al across the country are mobilizing especially in tennessee. so, you are going to see thi kind of a mine vie mobilization because of th entrenchment of our rights and i think the question is is that just mobilization for single election? or are you actuall fundamentally reshaping th american electorate, and american politics for decades? the texas case, i don t need t tell you, it will likely end u before the supreme court in the midst of the conflict o interest controversy, you have justice thomas responding to a new report from propublica showing her to crash trips pai for by a conservativ billionaire. he s calling the troops person hospitality from a close friend i wonder what you and your colleagues on the judiciar
mobilizing especially in tennessee. so, you are going to see thi kind of a mine vie mobilization because of th entrenchment of our rights and i think the question is is that just mobilization for single election? or are you actuall fundamentally reshaping th american electorate, and american politics for decades? the texas case, i don t need t tell you, it will likely end u before the supreme court in the midst of the conflict o interest controversy, you have justice thomas responding to a new report from propublica showing her to crash trips pai for by a conservativ billionaire. he s calling the troops person hospitality from a close friend i wonder what you and your colleagues on the judiciar committee see as your role i this we have not had you hearings, and a number of us including the chair of the judiciary committee has said t chief justice roberts asking