Attorneys for Priorities USA write in the motion that bypassing the appellate court is appropriate because the case presents "real and significant questions" of state constitutional law.
Attorneys for Priorities USA write in the motion that bypassing the appellate court is appropriate because the case presents "real and significant questions" of state constitutional law.
Attorneys for Priorities USA write in the motion that bypassing the appellate court is appropriate because the case presents "real and significant questions" of state constitutional law.
Attorneys for Priorities USA write in the motion that bypassing the appellate court is appropriate because the case presents "real and significant questions" of state constitutional law.
Attorneys for Priorities USA write in the motion that bypassing the appellate court is appropriate because the case presents "real and significant questions" of state constitutional law.