Stay updated with breaking news from Journalism rules. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
this is something the president predicted was right was never a legal basis for this, correct? president trump won the legal argument today. and the supreme court came out on his side and lifted the stay that the appeals court put in place. but the legal argument was never the strongest argument against the ban. it s the policy argument. really bad policy. tucker: will you concede that there was a legal argument against it, that the left as a group made and it was that a single judge in hawaii had more power over america s foreign policy and control of america s borders than the president did and the supreme court today said that s absurd. it wasn t just hawaii, tucker. there were a number of court cases in a number of courts that stayed this travel order. and it was a close call legally. it was a close call for the appeals court that upheld the stay. it was also a close call for the supreme court. tucker: the president has got a right to make judgments like this and enfor ....
that s why we have a president. you will concede that. i think that s a valid argument and that s the argument that was made. that s one of the arguments that persuaded the supreme court today. although, keep in mind, that the court only lifted the stay. it will hear the merits of the case in october. but, yes, you are right. but, as i said, the stronger argument against this travel ban is it s really bad policy. it doesn t accomplish the goal which is no-to-make america safer. tucker: it doesn t. you would argue the counter case that the more immigrants that we have from say somali coming into the country the safer we are? what point are you making. what i would argue on policy grounds this ban is both too broad and not broad enough. let me explain. here s why it s too broad. it denies muslims from six predominantly muslim countries. tucker: let me stop and correct you. it makes no reference to religion at all. it doesn t badge muslims. it bans people who live in six coun ....
Are the most identifiable people of fox news were on air spreading misinformation, spreading these election lies. and murdaugh allowed it. he not only allowed when people told him to stop and he was gonna get the company into trouble, as the head of the organization, not only fox news, but the larger fox company, he continue to allow. it s so, he allowed fox news to do it. it wasn t some rogue reporter or rogue anchor. it was the entire network, led by the various biggest stars. and only that, one of the biggest myths i was found about foxx was that there was some bright line between the new side and the prime opinion side. i work on both sides of that so-called line. and i found the journalism rules to be often nonexistent, basically. or at least a, even on the so-called new side, they fudged them under rogers direction, roger ailes s direction, then the chairman. so often that they were often not existent. ....
According to a survey conducted by two non-profits, 231 media outlets (40%) in Afghanistan have shuttered since the nation was taken over by. | News Track ....
Since the fall of the former Afghan government on the 15th of August, media in Afghanistan has been facing new challenges that has led to the closing of many outlets, and has caused many wo ....