Christian and arminia muslim. The two countries we re were pa rt of were part of the Old Soviet Union but when that fell apart tensions escalated. These are parts of the first war between 1992 and 1994. 30,000 people were estimated to have lost their lives. A ceasefire was announced in 1994 but never address the underlying issues and what followed was a ceasefire. 0ver the underlying issues and what followed was a ceasefire. Over a decade later in 2008 these are Russian Mediated talks held but that fell apart. In 2020 that fell apart. Azerbaijan launched an offensive but we captured territory. Thousands of soldiers on both sides reported to have been killed in six weeks of fierce fighting. Another truce was agreed to be monitored by russian peacekeepers. They were to monitor the safe passage of a corridor connecting Nagorno Karabakh To Arminia Moscow attention was diverted by its war in ukraine and tensions were raised and for the last nine months azerbaijan has imposed an effective bl
ground covering the ins and outs of this story. how confident are you that election fraud did take place? well, we have people admitting to it. we have people admitting that they went around and picked up absentee ballots in north carolina. that s illegal. not only did they pick up the absentee ballots. they say they did not put them directly in the mail. they delivered them to the man who appears to be at the center of all this. not only did they deliver them, they say they don t know what he did with them. they don t know whether the votes actually went into the mail from his office. and, again, you have spoken to people. we ll get to the journalism aspect of this, the work you have done on this in a second. but you report that this man was working connected to the campaign of the republican candidate mark harris. you spoke to a woman who says she was paid by him in this case. explain that. yes. two women tell me they were paid by him.
i haven t read the interview. oftentimes softball interviews can glean a lot of new information, because that person feels so comfortable. i m not sure if that was, you know, achieved in this case, but you know, to give sean penn a little bit of credit, let s face it, guys, it takes a lot of courage to go up into the mountains and sit across from a vicious drug dealer and conduct an interview. let s talk about that issue about the journalism aspect of this a little bit. sure. one is, do you think that journalistically speaking, i don t know if you had a chance to read the piece but journalistically speaking was there any journalistic value in that interview? yes. i disagree a little bit. i think that it shows moxie and most journalists would not break rules or ethics and i don t know that penn did it. to get the interview is a cous, it s a get. absolutely. just to hear el chapo talking about his life story is interesting. there s a value to that, and journalists needn t wor
who has raised no small amount of money. and who is supporting hillary clinton, and they want to raise $2.5 billion. well, the koch brothers are going to dub somebody as the leader, at least on the financial side, when it comes to the republican nomination. that is extraordinary. it s unusual. it deserved comment and i m glad he mentioned it. although i heard tara saying, plenty of money going to the democrats too. i thought it was ironic that the president who raised 1.3 billion or something like that, was talking about billionaires, like george soros who supported him. but the president has good comedic timing. some of the shots were very, very biting. the key and peelle, hilarious. but i do, let s just put it in perspective, why he addressed the journalism aspect of this toward the end, a, because he s been criticized resoundingly by the white house correspondents association for the lack of access.
the fbi actually accuses james rosen of being a co-conspirator on very serious crimes in the affidavit. i ve never seen that. i ve never known haven t seen anything like that in any of the affidavits ever that i ve looked at. it s something that a lot of journalists have discussed in the history of the relationship that the government has. there s been a tacit understanding that they may go after the leaker or the government source but never the journalist. for here to have a suggestion that james rosen allegedly enged in criminal activity by talking with a source, that seems to be new to some people. they re focusing on the journalism aspect. i m a lawyer, you re a lawyer. i m appalled that a judge didn t see what was going on. the point of having a judge review a search warrant and sign off or not, is so it can be the independent person s, not a team trying to get somebody. you also know there s a lot of weight when an fbi agent signs an affidavit, puts his name to the allega