and since then there has been right now in the planning pipeline crossing to director ram another 68 thousand units being built on the polk side we have outdated traffic information we re looking at as well as the development of the polk street plan as wrarpts to the corridor balloon with the hospital and have changes in the employment dominate when we started 51 percent of the hospital workers lived in san francisco now we re down to less than 40 percent more and more people are consulting in from longer distances to work in our hospitals and other critical businesses operation of the hospital and of so many other businesses in san francisco but particularly in the van ness corridor a hospital cannot operate without the brt the brt must come first we strongly urge you to have environmental impact report done thank you thank you. next speaker, please. (calling names) good afternoon. good afternoon marching i m here with the coalition of san francisco neighborhood and i
two years didn t make sense for a small area to have this legacy pilot program with the congestion that s not been studied which that is the most dangerous from 5 to 8:00 p.m. i ll urge to look at this before approving it and think this over if it s a great idea in theory but in practice take a closer lock thank please (clapping) (calling names). good afternoon. i m rose i have a different idea bikes want to use polk street because it s flat they can move to a different street the businesses can t but van ness is pretty flat very wide situations and very few pedestrians and the new bicycle complain not buses every single minute why couldn t the bikes travel in the bus lane safely or make a lane for those very wide sidewalks are through could be one think each side be safer for pedestrians and safer for bikes for the elimination of the traffic on polk street it s no one really wants to be walking we have to save the parks and the businesses why can t we look at this thing
how studied or how many merchant were interviewed i ve been to the meetings on church and the out reaches but polk street logically in size is narrowed because it s an older street i m not anti bike or pro car or pro bike and anti car i want to look at an ideal legacy plan to make that work for both sides it is just not seeming to work for this we ve been at this for two years didn t make sense for a small area to have this legacy pilot program with the congestion that s not been studied which that is the most dangerous from 5 to 8:00 p.m. i ll urge to look at this before approving it and think this over if it s a great idea in theory but in practice take a closer lock thank please (clapping) (calling names). good afternoon. i m rose i have a different idea bikes want to use polk street because it s flat they can move to a different street the businesses can t but van ness is pretty flat very wide situations and very few pedestrians and the new bicycle complain not buses
that work for both sides it is just not seeming to work for this we ve been at this for two years didn t make sense for a small area to have this legacy pilot program with the congestion that s not been studied which that is the most dangerous from 5 to 8:00 p.m. i ll urge to look at this before approving it and think this over if it s a great idea in theory but in practice take a closer lock thank please (clapping) (calling names). good afternoon. i m rose i have a different idea bikes want to use polk street because it s flat they can move to a different street the businesses can t but van ness is pretty flat very wide situations and very few pedestrians and the new bicycle complain not buses every single minute why couldn t the bikes travel in the bus lane safely or make a lane for those very wide sidewalks are through could be one think each side be safer for pedestrians and safer for bikes for the elimination of the traffic on polk street it s no one really wants to
not anti bike or pro car or pro bike and anti car i want to look at an ideal legacy plan to make that work for both sides it is just not seeming to work for this we ve been at this for two years didn t make sense for a small area to have this legacy pilot program with the congestion that s not been studied which that is the most dangerous from 5 to 8:00 p.m. i ll urge to look at this before approving it and think this over if it s a great idea in theory but in practice take a closer lock thank please (clapping) (calling names). good afternoon. i m rose i have a different idea bikes want to use polk street because it s flat they can move to a different street the businesses can t but van ness is pretty flat very wide situations and very few pedestrians and the new bicycle complain not buses every single minute why couldn t the bikes travel in the bus lane safely or make a lane for those very wide sidewalks are through could be one think each side be safer for pedestrians a