item number 2 is approval of the minutes for the september 22nd port commission meeting. so moved. clerk: it looks like we may have lost the commissioner. let s see if she can rejoin us. [no audio] commissioner, are you able to call in with audio? commissioners, are you able to dial in using the phone number on the teams link? we have your video, just not your audio. hi, i can barely hear you commissioner brandon. oh, i m sorry. can we use (indiscernible) signal? yes, if it s visible. so people would need to (indiscernible) yes. okay. so i ll so, commissioner wuho is here. i got back into the own meeting, doreen. right, right. okay. trying to give you hand signals. great. okay. now we have a quorum. can i have a second to approve the minutes? second. all in favor? oh, no roll call vote, please. clerk: sure. [roll call] thank you. item number 3 is public comment on executive session. we will open up the phone lines to public comment. the mem
the pier 740 master plan which eventually led to historic core, it resulted in those buildings being rehabilitated and rfp that resulted in brookfield taking over the waterfront site as our partner on that location and the next slide, built on to that process in 2013. our planning and environment group developed a crane cove park plan. you can see here it s very similar to what ultimately has been delivered on site which is very exciting. and the kneass building was not addressed with use it might serve. building 49 was. it s in the center of the slide. we opened it would be used for water recreation and bicycle parking on site so we re not sure if we need additional as well as a site and next slide. please. there are eight goals that apply to the southern waterfront and we ve pulled out throw in particular that we think really speaks to what might go i go ine buildings. number two listed in the staff report has to do withens hancements water recreation and enhancement to the
three minutes on any matter within the commission jurisdiction does not appear on the agenda. speakers shall address their remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individual commissioners or department personnel. commissioners are not to enter into debate or discussion with a speaker. the lack of response by the commissioners or department personnel does not necessarily constitute agreement with or support of statements made during public comment. thank you, madame secretary. is there anyone who would like to give public comment? please identify yourself. good evening, commissioners. my name is jeremy paul. i may permit consultant in san francisco and i have been doing this for 30 years. i have a particular interest in art spaces and cultural treasures, and something has come onto my radar that you should know about a very old and legendary artists lived workspace that dates back to the early seventies and has literally been engaged in every artistic movement to h
item one is roll call. [roll call] item two is general public comment. members of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes on any matter within the commission jurisdiction does not appear on the agenda. speakers shall address their remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individual commissioners or department personnel. commissioners are not to enter into debate or discussion with a speaker. the lack of response by the commissioners or department personnel does not necessarily constitute agreement with or support of statements made during public comment. thank you, madame secretary. is there anyone who would like to give public comment? please identify yourself. good evening, commissioners. my name is jeremy paul. i may permit consultant in san francisco and i have been doing this for 30 years. i have a particular interest in art spaces and cultural treasures, and something has come onto my radar that you should know about a very old and leg
going to be working on. and one question that i do have because i just want to make sure that i m clear on this as we move forward we re asking the businesses to take out a loan to support the lack of business for something that we caused? if if the business requires that kind of cash flow, in theory, yes. thank you. thank you, commissioner walton. commissioner safai. thank you, chair peskin. and we were involved and our office was deeply involved in this small of eraf. and i want to echo what the commissioner fewer said and as well as commissioner walton. and i just want to be clear what we did when we worked with the p.u.c. was that we looked at previous revenues to construction and then post-revenues to construction and it wasn t necessarily a loan, because i think that we shouldn t be in a conversation about unless it s a forgivable loan, we should be in a conversation about helping to mitigate the loss of revenues and that s what at least my intention w