translating the values of the fifth amendment to the modern age. the fifth amendment, concerned about thought crimes, not exerting psychological pressure. he ended by quoting my hero about how government is the omnipotent teacher and you can see that in his letter he thought the court has to be a shining emblem for what human dignity needs. we heard the chief justice you can do the best job you could in the context of the law. time will affect decisions. you re suggesting it s time for us to rethink the technology i think it is. i think miranda could be updated and could be more effective. there were at the love people thinking about this and hopefully, we can all come together and try to think about things like body cameras, video taping and interrogations. other things that would update miranda. thanks to both of you for being here tonight on our 11 of 12 cases in the landmark cases series. we appreciate your insight from the miranda case. thank you so much for bein
let me conclude, because i want you guys to have something to eat. we will have a session after dinner where we will teak questions and answers and we will take it from there. but let me conclude again. thank you for being here tonight. thank you for your willingness to be part after dialogue because we need a dialogue. as a nation, we have to make some tough choices. and we want to have a well informed dialogue when we make those choices. and we ve got to realize that there s a wide range of opinions out there. i understand that. but the dialogue has to represent multiple view points. that is at heart what is the strength of america. the idea that we can bring together lots of individuals with lots of different view points and yet we can still remain who we are and what we are and what we are about. that is what makes me so proud to be the director of the national security agency because i believe in its mission and i believe in its men and women. i m proud to stand up and s
what. my argument to jay was, as far as we are concerned, we made the decision, let s execute, let s drive. and no longer interested in what i consider to be mindless deb e debates about who ought to do what. this is characterization, i apologize. but i m not interested in control. i m interested in outcome. that s what matters to me. can you come to my living room any time. yes ma a, ma am. [ applause ] thank you. thank you. this is great. your presentation. great. and at the table with us, director of national intelligence, director proper. director proper wanted to come up. wow. . listen, i know this is a school night. it is for me. so i ll be brief. i years ago i did this with joe dempsey. what do you do with your legs? put them i was watching for that. secondly, i do want to thank the corporate sponsors because evenings like this wouldn t happen without the support of the corporate sponsors. so thank you. [ applause ] so mike rogers is a testament
i think that is an importantd point. it has auld happened. and will always happen. gets one thing that is really encouraging even for this room is at least the younger at journalists and the journalists coming from the businesses i vee been meeting are amazingly intrepid and investigative and have tools that we don t have. they re really good at using social media. they re really good at searchind on the web and figuring out what s going weon. there are people working for vice and all sorts of ll organizations. they re doing really exciting work. and i think that s a very positive indication ore the world is heading. evenft s insightful, some ome organizations, there are so many people out there trying t get that information that i think it s a real positiv tohat -s this plays ly omething steai ear.plrls th abilietspecially for ntnational vestigive ories, mean some o instigive workf of any news orzagaon over st couple oninte stigvee reporting. so public also, youe trngo c