indictment s will, not could or might, but will spark rioting in the streets. john berman in for anderson. and whatever you make of the thinly veiled threat of political violence, you should know it comes from a republican member of the senate judiciary committee. lindsey graham speaking to grey gowdy. i ll say this, if there s a prosecution of donald trump for mishandling classified information after the clinton debacle, which you presided over and did a hell of a good job, there would be riots in the street. the former judiciary chair did not follow that remark by saying, of course, such violence would be wrong. instead, he repeated and amplify whad he said. and the former president reposted several attacks on the fbi and a post of his own in which he appeared to be calling for an uprising within the bureau. quoting now, one of the great agents and others in the fbi going to say we aren t going to take it anymore. he also demanded to be declared, quote, the rightful win
know, steve there, too?l, well, that depends on if he if-t he would accept these rules that we ve spent a lot of timeto on . so we d have to have tha htave h at discussion with steve scalise.w so far , steve scalise hasn t indicated that he would run. i would i would far prefer jim n and if kevin mccarthy pulls the race, i do. yeah, i do expect jim jordan top to mount a campaign. oh, well, he isn t running yet. if if look, if kevin mccarthy got out of this race, and jim it jordan would get down to it,nd l that s my belief. and i believe jim jordan would h win. i think he would invigoraten our movement. i think he s broadly trustedeveo every corner of the republican party and with a lot ofsuppor our donors and supporters and activists. thn if the type of optio kevin mccarthy is out, ifout, kevin mccarthy doesn t bow out, then he will have to livhave tec the entire speakership in a straitjacket constructedkehe by these rules that we re working on now. lu prefer a speakerho with a str
of his neck. but no, it was balenciaga level fashion statement. new york times is just named no, it was a fashion statement. named john fetterman to the list of the ninety three most w stylish people of the year. quote, the senatoras a from pennsylvania is going to bring carhartt to the capital . he sg thisre they tellin ? because they want to subvert esthetics because they hate ey tellibeauty, because they hae truth. it s actually deep. that s exactly what the ugly is . beautiful. sean hannity, who is beautiful, joinans us . if i vote, i think you re way wy better dressed than john fetterman. ettetrust fund brad in a hoodie. i mean, i don t even think it s close my vote, and that s not ying much because i wear the same clothes. thank you. all right, tucker, thankty: all and welcome to hannity. and tonight, we have new ning revelations from twitter with a lot more to come.ar now, apparently, elotln musk thinks that dr. anthony fauci might be in real trouble. we have a full report
heed, you do so at your own peril. i dty venture a guesse to your name may now be oname ma the listy with my name. i m just guessing, but i m usually on every list. sohock me. doesn t really shock. jonathan turley, thank you. mul right. here nowch, with much more ,y ranking member of the house judiciary committee, ohio congressmammittee,jim n jim jor your investigation is into fi the whether or not our fbi has been politicized and whether or not the department of justice e has been weaponizes. now we have the twitter files where elon musk clearly said a week ago saturday thaterence election, an appearance, in fact, took place by the a ssuppression of information on twitter. i agree with him. het ho talked about how the meda is complicit and how twitter became basically a propaganda arm of the democratic party when you put that togethercame with what we know about the bidens and the laptop, you know, look at the video here. yo u have a vicee president withholding a billion
back territory that they lost weeks or months ago in the early stages of this invasion. it appears that the focus will be in the south around kherson. it s really the only provincial capital that s been captured by the russians since the start of the invasion. their ambition here and john, you and i have reported on the public comments of ukrainian officials saying, listen, we re not going to sit back and satisfy ourselves with defending so that we don t lose more territory. the intention of the ukrainian president and his commanders is to pull back some territory that s already been lost. and this is something that u.s. officials have seen, has been communicated to them for some time now. of course the test will be how much of that territory can they gain back and over what period of time. and how much can they hold and how long will the front be? these are all questions we have to watch and see how this develops. also, jim n recent days there s been this increased concern of a po