Husband irvings are here i was by her personal journey and undying faith in humanity. I also learned she and Justice Ginsburg when we moved to washington, it seems natural to organize the conversation between these two extraordinary women. Iat opportunity arose when had the privilege of attending a small private dinner. She had Justice Ginsburg with and i asked her if this if this group would be interested in a conversation. It became this threesome. It would not have been possible had Justice Ginsburg not reached out to doris. This evening is the result of the support of many extraordinary women who pull their resources together. , the three justices, of course, misses wilhelmina holiday. She has the only Museum Dedicated to a woman in the arts in the world. Judy woodruff, icon in journalism. Misses bennett, a force of nature in washington. My friend connie milstein. And many, many others. This evening, this conversation is truly historic and we have gathered three women from three s
Religion. In this country, it is not the department of judges, juries or government officials twere goveo decide who ought to teach catholic fifthgraders that jesus is the son of god or who ought to teach jewish preschoolers what it means to say here israel the lord your god and fun and that is what these cases are about is who controls and who teaches the faith. The answer is easy, churches misuse thoseth who teach their faith. Indeed it ispo one of the most important religious functions for any community. Passing the faith onto the next generation. With the churchs primary agents for teaching to fifthgraders teaching them for hours a week much more than parish priests, they fall within the exception of the community. Respondents would have the court ignorcourts ignore all that substituting the standard on first and foremost the title to determine whether the exception applies. That would elevate the form and force judges to decide what is religious enough to qualify and it would help
Of church and state means anything at all, it must mean the government cannot interfere with the churchs decisions about who is authorized to teach its religion. In this country, it is not the province of justice, juries or Government Official to decide who will teach catholic fifthgraders, or who want to teach Jewish School is what it means to say here, o israel, the lord is one. That is what these cases are about. Who controls who teaches the faith schoolchildren. The answer is easy. Churches must choose those who teach their faith. That is one of the most important religious functions for any religious community. Pass anaphase onto the next generation. Since it teachers with the church. Primary agents for teaching the catholic faith to fifthgraders, much more, they fall within the exception immunity. Less fondant would have accorded court ignore all that. Substituting a standard that relies on the title to determine whether there is an exception. That would wrongly elevate form over
Please the court, the separation of church and state means anything at all, it must mean the government cannot interfere with the churchs decisions about who is authorized to teach its religion. In this country, it is not the province of justice, juries or Government Official to decide who will teach catholic fifthgraders, or who want to teach Jewish School is what it means to say here, o israel, the lord is one. That is what these cases are about. Who controls who teaches the faith schoolchildren. The answer is easy. Churches must choose those who teach their faith. That is one of the most important religious functions for any religious community. Pass anaphase onto the next generation. Since it teachers with the church. Primary agents for teaching the catholic faith to fifthgraders, much more, they fall within the exception immunity. Less fondant would have accorded court ignore all that. Substituting a standard that relies on the title to determine whether there is an exception. Tha
These cases are about who teaches the faith to schoolchildren. Is easy. Churches must choose those who teach their faith. That is one of the most important religious f churches must teach the faith, passing it onto to the next generation. Primary agents for teaching the catholic faith to fifthgraders, much more, they fall within the exception immunity. Less fondant would have accorded court ignore all that. Substituting a standard that relies on the title to determine whether there is an exception. That would wrongly elevate form over function enforce judges to decide what title some religious enough to qualify. And it would entangle churches to date. I no court is ever adopted respondent title tests. Respondents are recycled many of the arguments that courts rejected years ago. The pretext inquiry, the notice requirement, the idea that freedom is association makes freedom of religion entirely unnecessary, all were raised in hosea tabor and rejected unanimously. Eight years later, argu