Page 5 - Jet Law News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Jet law. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Jet Law Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Process i regret. i regret putting my family through this. but to my question senator, the fact of the matter is, it is what it is. and it s this body that makes the laws. and if you wish to ha more disclosure, pass a law and a judge will enforce it, senator. there are going to be that s just not that just doesn t do, judge gorsuch. there are going to be questions that you will be asked to decide on the united states supreme court that are going to be dependent on the values you bring to this. i don t think you can avoid talking about those values here. you are an expert on anti-trust law, correct? you are very good at that. i wouldn t count myself an expert, senator. when you write about anti-trust law, you understand that there are values to which the law should be directed if it s going to be successful. ....
Precedent. that s the anchor of the law. it s the starting point. but there are instances when a court may appropriately overrule precedent after considering a lot of factors. and we ve talked about them and i m happy to discuss them with you again if you would like. but i don t want to waste your time either. so you tell me. so you see this as something where there was precedent i mean you go back to buckley versus vallejo. parts of that, you discussed with my colleagues stayed in place. but overturned parts of that. austin, mcconnell. there was just a number of cases that it overturned. to us up here, it was a major overturning of precedent. and so that s why we are so concerned when people say oh, we are going to respect precedent and then they come in and do that. actually, you have suggested that you would actually go further than citizen s united. 2456s in riddle versus hillary clintonen looper 2014 case. while it was a narrow case about ....
Part of the reason is because the tragedy that this young girl dealt with, had inflicted upon her. whatever the word is. this is why he is passionate about this, because people are victims of these crimes in terms of them, they are victims of the economic piece of it. there is a national security piece. but immigration pays its toll on our people if it s not don done legally. this is another reason why the president is passionate about it. it s multiple facetted. why i just read off that this executive order is dealing with people who committed crimes who local enforcement agency or municipal palities at the state level are not dealing with it. if you go to i.c.e. website and download this it s over 30 something pages of cases where people where a person is convicted of a crime where local law enforcement for one reason or another are not enforcing the law and turning that individual over to federal authorities to ....
His opinn. i d like to ask about the law in that case, in the trans am trucking case. the applicable statute said that you cannot fire someone for, quote, refusing to operate a vehicle. is that consistent with your wreck? sitting here, that s my recollection. ? that case, the trucker was fired because he operated his vehicle, the vehicle that he was assigned to, against company orders. is that a fair summary base on what you remember from that case? yes, senator. so one could argue, and i think one could argue conclusively, and i think it was argued and decided in that case that this was a fairly clear application of the law, because if what the law said that the person couldn t be fired for refusing to operate a vehicle, ....
It didn t apply in the way the terminated employee wanted it to apply in that case. but you applied it fairly in the other case. i also wanted to bring your attention to another case that s been menksed by some of my colleagues. and that s the wong case. it is a case where a professor with cancer wanted to extend her leave. the university said no. and the professor sued. the panel ultimately concluded that the law required her to show that she could continue to perform her job if the university provided an accommodation. and all the parties in that case agreed that she could not, that she couldn t continue to perform it. that, as i recall, was a unanimous opinion; is that correct? senator, that was another very hard case to go home after. the individual there had was ....