a result of some of these events. and so i just wanted to make sure that i put that on your radar. if this is the beginning of many conversations like that, the very first is a big eir and we talk with the studio wall 330, and the giant mission ro ject and we know that there is a lot of going on with pier 70 and we are working on now to come up with something this spring and i welcome the chance to come back and talk about what we learned and the tratgies are and what can we do with america s cup and what are we doing now with the giants that will enhance, and especially working with the neighbors, because no one feels the impacts more not just the people who live there but the people in the cal train, because all of the street cars are cued up and therefore they have missed a train. and so i will be happy to continue this conversation and we are kicking off the planning studies and i want to make sure that i do not hold up liz and she will answer the questions as well. jus
this and there is an overlapping between the mta and the cta and ininvolvement in the warrior s eir that the water front transit assessment, and that is not clear here. and what eir are you talking about? we know that the eir for the warriors is post up and well we don t know when, because they keep designing the project new and the date keeps receding. and but, what we have along the water front, is no outlet, there is embarcadero and there is the bay on one side and there are hills and bay bridge on the other side it is not like you have a lot of choices unless you are a shurpa and you want to go over the bridge. but we don t have transit worth crap in this area. and no one seems to care about it except for the district six supervisor. but if we don t resolve this problem, in conjunction with this study, we are not addressing the problem. we have arena that is not basketball, it is a 252 day arena and on the other side there is a hotel and up scale housing, right conver
impact. that the work will be complete before the impact report is published and to finish the work in the spring and now i will talk about the meat of what we will be doing. we will look at existing condition and we will two years in the future and a 2020 and 2040 horizon year and we will look at two land use scenario and one is our base line plans move forward and no additional land use is planned or moves forward on the water front and the scenarios where the three developments are also approved to move forward. and four, each of those scenarios, we would look at a set of corridors, that are expected to be most impacted, by the developments, and we have identified, both local transit and regional transit corridors shown here. as well as local roadways and freeway ramps that would also be looked at in the context of the analysis. and with this corridor approach. and then, the analysis would nen proceed in five steps and, we would start by doing a efficiency analysis to un
that might be available to address the transportation impacts created by the developments. ask as that phase is coming to conclusion, we have been scoping the next phase that comes into more detail. and so the scope will be that the transportation authority will be the water front assessment. and a note about the timing, this is off of the environmental impact report for the arena and we were waiting for the most recent design, 3.0 that gives us more clarity on what the proposed project is and so that we can analyze the impact. that the work will be complete before the impact report is published and to finish the work in the spring and now i will talk about the meat of what we will be doing. we will look at existing condition and we will two years in the future and a 2020 and 2040 horizon year and we will look at two land use scenario and one is our base line plans move forward and no additional land use is planned or moves forward on the water front and the scenarios where
we will look at existing condition and we will two years in the future and a 2020 and 2040 horizon year and we will look at two land use scenario and one is our base line plans move forward and no additional land use is planned or moves forward on the water front and the scenarios where the three developments are also approved to move forward. and four, each of those scenarios, we would look at a set of corridors, that are expected to be most impacted, by the developments, and we have identified, both local transit and regional transit corridors shown here. as well as local roadways and freeway ramps that would also be looked at in the context of the analysis. and with this corridor approach. and then, the analysis would nen proceed in five steps and, we would start by doing a efficiency analysis to understand what would be happening in those corridors and how many trips are expected and what are the deficiencies with respect to the capacity, capacity, mobility and flexibil