Stay updated with breaking news from Jeremy bentham. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
it is great to have such a large for there on this day election, as we are all sort of anxiously awaiting what happens. it is a genuine pleasure for me to be able to introduce amanda to you. director ofssociate the national history center. i have worked with her for the past 2.5 years. i could sing your praises ad .auseam she is indispensable to the operations and success of the center over the years. for someone who is so young, she had an interesting and varied career. before she became an historian, she was a pastry chef and worked at a prominent restaurant and got her phd at the university of michigan and a postdoc at yale. at the same time, she has continued her interest in food history. she has taught historical cooking classes. she has a blog called just desserts. she has herto that, mainstay as a historian, her work on the origins of humanitarianism and that has led to the book from empire to the american revolution and origins of humanitarianism which was pub ....
she talks about the motivations and charity work of mid-18th-century north american and british philanthropists and humanitarians. this event was cohosted by the woodrow wilson center and national history center. it is just under 90 minutes. all right. it is great to have such a large crowd here on this day for the before the election, as we are all sort of anxiously awaiting what happens. it is a genuine pleasure for me to be able to introduce amanda to you. she is the associate director of the national history center. i have worked with her for the past 2.5 years. i could sing her praises ad nauseam. i will simply say she has been indispensable to the operations and success of the center over the years. for someone who is so young, she has had a really interesting and varied career. before she became an historian, she was a pastry chef and worked at some prominent restaurants. then got her phd at the university of michigan and a postdoc at yale. at the same time, ....
three, trump is a good man. the first argument, trump is the lesser of two evils, is the most compelling of the three to me. in fact it is an argument i have , used many times, trying to convince my friends not to vote for a third-party candidate because the republican was not sufficiently pure. i respect my friends who concluded they must vote for drunk cop for trump, however reluctantly. they believe the supreme court hangs in the balance and he is more likely to support conservative justices and i think they are right. as one who worked on judicial nominations in the bush white house, i care deeply about the court. yet, i ve concluded this justification is insufficient. first, trump may be a threat to our democratic republic. this is a serious charge. unfortunately, trump s statements have given me ample reason to be concerned. i care about the supreme court because i care deeply about the government handed down to was by handed down to us by the founders. the fo ....
forgiveness, who does not identify jesus christ as his lord and savior but says he s a christian. if we are in the public square advocating for someone like that, what good are we as christians to say we believe in scripture when scripture tells us we should not be advocating for a person like that. this election is ultimately, either way we ve got someone we don t want. i realize some of you decided he s better than her. that is fine. some say he could be cyrus letting us back into the holy land. between the lesser two evils, god has never asked his people to choose the evil. he has done it for them. he didn t ask the israelites to open the gates, he open the gates. he did not ask the people to do that. i don t think we should be doing that. history, i am sure of it would show us there are people who told those in babylon it s just a statue. we don t remember them, we remember the man who refused to bow. i believe in a god and a last day and a savior and i believe on t ....
no use of legislative history. described the opposing theories of interpretation. and most importantly i have gone through the steps that a textual list has to take. in order to produce a correct reading of the text. namely the so-called canons of interpretation. ancient andrgely common sense how language is used. brian lamb: who d you expect to read this. scalia: i hope judges and lawyers and law students will read it. i hope legislators will read it. important that legislators know how their language will be interpreted by the courts as it is for the courts to know how they ought to interpret the language. lamb: i m not a lawyer. justice scalia: the addition to the general public. it would give the general reader world ofinto the judges. about deciding on the meaning of enacted texts. all, most important of what is the true fault line in judges. judges.ishing the fall line is not conservative versus liberal. it is rather theories of interpretation which differ. lamb: ....