Jeopardy. Because those are the very things that create those jobs. And if we are forced to go out of business, if were forced to move, if were forced to curtail hiring and if we are forced to downsize and if we are forced to eliminate a lot of optional benefits that people dont consider that happen at the smallbusiness level, where they operate more like familis and benefits that are extend to employees that are not part of sort of the general conversation, but have real value. Whether its paid timeoff. Whether it be help when help is needed when there is someone sick or someone needs a break . So we could force ourselves into a situation where all of those kinds of discretionary benefits just cant even be offered because they are not economically possible. It could eliminate profitsharing. It could eliminate the hiring of entrylevel employee because im already paying a wage for someone with experience, so why would i hire someone who doesnt have experience . So as an altruistic as yo
Needed when there is someone sick or someone needs a break . So we could force ourselves into a situation where all of those kinds of discretionary benefits just cant even be offered because they are not economically possible. It could eliminate profitsharing. It could eliminate the hiring of entrylevel employee because im already paying a wage for someone with experience, so why would i hire someone who doesnt have experience . So as an altruistic as you would like to be, altruism can be stymied by the bottom line and if there is no bottom line, a lot of these things could be in jeopardy. This issue is a very significant one for traditional, small, independentlyowned business as we know them today. Whether these changes are inevitable over time is debatable. But certainly were looking a scenario which would so dramatically accelerate them and outside of any kind of timehorizon for planning. That is one of the big issues there is no time to plan for this. Going to 13 an hour on january
Thousand dollars those are my highlights questions for the executive director relating to the executive director report . Public comment . Commissioners ray heart director of San Francisco open government this is a generic one size fits all fits all nothing more or less each month i intend to go select one item to discuss today, its item 7. On statements of economic interests. For years city larger than lewis accepted thousands of dollars even if responsibilityable gifts from friends he go forward his fiduciary job expend by the fund from 2000 to 2013 if the public sees the screen the commissioners are busy doing busy work he did so well enforcing the oversight for the millions of dollars 0 raised by group and year after yes, he pursue go right ahead himself in a quick prokwo arrangement he utilized about accepting the gifts and look at it this other way where the if i understand were going he abused his job to withhold public records that uncovers the its in vision of the brown act an
Anything about even having a concern. We had a followup hearing where the da and sheriff came and its clear that the da and the sheriff have a different perspective. The Police Department, once again, was not at the hearing, did not present any concerns so i do believe that before we move forward that we should give the Police Department an opportunity to present its concerns to the Sheriffs Department so i think continuing this item so there is that dialogue makes sense. I want to note a couple of things i know that supervisor e is here because both of us made it very clear that no one on that committee would support em in any way continuing or expanding if Public Safety in any way was compromised. The concern articulated by the da was about the fact they needed to be a uniform metric, which was interesting because the da also noted that day themselves havent had a metric in years and the sheriff actually has a metric, but i think that for both supervisor yee and me, what was really i
But in having a say more than in at least 18 instances in the past on through measures that address the future of the water front. You may not like what the voters have to say, but i think that even though who disagree with a specific po six should support the right of voters in a democracy to have a voice. The rest i submit. Thank you supervisor campos. Seeing no other names on the roster that concludes the introduction of new business. Thank you. Since our chief is back and i know he has a lot of work on his plate id like to go back to the item about home detention so we can go to item 50. I know there are a number of colleagues who have a number of questions, but thank you for rushing back. If you want to take a few moments to explain your perspective, we heard it secondhand through jason elliot, but if you could share with us why you have issues. Sure. I really apologize that i had to leave. I never want to be disrespectful. I knee how busy you are and how long these nights go but