i m told one cabinet nominee has has submitted his has completed his, so we re going to hear a lot about that this week, about the background checks and the vetting, et cetera, but i went back and looked this up. in january of 09, some eight years ago, a lot of the fbi background checks and the vetting was not done at the time as well so there were seven six or seven nominees waiting for president obama when he took office. i don t know that there will be that many for for this time around, but there are going to be a lot of them without a question. you know, there s not much the democrats can do about it. except slow it down. slow it down. that s the thing. republicans are pushing hard for the seven nominees to be confirmed, to be in line with what obama got on the first day in office. they want that done by january 20th, but democrats can absolutely deny that by objecting and doing delay tactics and it seems like that they will in a lot of these instances in order no
this is just the very beginning of this. they do have to answer some of these questions. and you re totally right, there s nothing no huge smoking gun in the book that we know of right now. but it does raise questions of speaking fees of why that one $2.35 million donation was not disclosed. when she was becoming secretary of state in january of 09 she signed a document saying she would disclose all contributions to the foundation. that apparently did not happen. there are still more questions about this. but the bigger picture is this. is this going to affect the trust and credibility of her? voters are not paying attention to this issue right now, but the bigger question is are people going to say more 1k57b8dscandal, more this, we saw them say that yesterday in south carolina. i want to turn to carol on this, because there may not be a smoke gun but there is when it comes to the clintons smoking gun fatigue and it s been going on for decades and i m just curious how big of a pr
ready for that. it s worth noting that the republicans seem to be talking only about me. i don t know what they would talk about if i were not in the race. it s all about me at this point, jeff. is that hillary clinton s line of defense now? she is right about that and i was in new hampshire with her when she said that and that s the only time she addressed this and she did it briefly. i think it races legitimate questions that people have to answer about if she was elected president, what role would bill have then? the do have to answer some of the questions. you are totally right, and there is no huge smoking gun in the book that we know of right now, and it does raise questions of speaking fees of why that one $2.35 million donation was disclosed when he was becoming secretary of state in january of 09, and she signed a document saying she would disclose all contributions to the foundation
detainees, mueller said that videotapes were, quote, not being made, end quote, but did not disclose that videotapes of previous waterboarding sessions had been made and still existed. source, e-mail from scott mueller dated june 7th, 2003. there are many, many more examples in the committee s report. all are documented. the third set of findings and conclusions notes the various ways in which cia management of the detention and management program from the inception to the formal termination in january of 09 was inadequate and deeply flawed. there is no doubt that the program was by any major measure a major cia undertaking. it raised significant legal and policy issues and involved significant resources and
sent and received which may be lost due to a computer crash. some of her e-mails between january of 09 and app of 2011 had been wrieped out years ago. writing, the irs determined her hard drive crashed in 2011. at the time, mrs. learner asked irs i.t. professionals to restore her hard drive and they have been unable to do so. they are upset that congress was not noticed earlier, and darrell issa is accusing the irs of playing games. others sounding off saying the lawmakers should not take the agency at its word. this is the most obtuse administration when it comes to being honest and forth right. i think the fbi could probably go back and retrieve the e-mails because in many cases things that you think are deleted, they