Stay updated with breaking news from Jane sandel. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Rock leases that were posing to consolidate into a single lease extension with Mission Valley rock company. It encompasses a parcel is referred to in many cases as s p 24 Surface Mining permit 24. Which is necessary for Water Management and fine management for Mission Valley box operation. The area to the northward of it is number 32 was the active mining area they use reyna. So this v6 engine would match up with the other lease and allow them to continue their operation inefficiently but also has benefits for us in terms of Water Management, both for the Alameda Creek recapture project and the san antonio bypass i plan parts. We recommend approval of t ....
Thats where the rubber would hit the road because we be hurting at that point in time. So, i recommendation at this point would be to increase the excess use charge to three times, believe the reduction level at 25 for interruptible customers as well. Whats in front of us actually is different than that is in it but yes. Its a 30 reduction for interruptible customers. Im recommending at this point do we limit that to 25 because were actually getting the performance at a people. Im not sure we need to bump that up but deftly bump up the penalties so [inaudible] have to pay more if they screw up i like to keep it at the higher level. I understand people and performing very well and with that hopefully will mean nobody runs into these limits. These are folks that have been getting a rate reduction and i think we really need to make sure the reduction that we water is greater than for people not getting that great benefit. Its a small increments. Just to maintain the integrity of the rates ....
Be hurting at that point in time. So, i recommendation at this point would be to increase the excess use charge to three times, believe the reduction level at 25 for interruptible customers as well. Whats in front of us actually is different than that is in it but yes. Its a 30 reduction for interruptible customers. Im recommending at this point do we limit that to 25 because were actually getting the performance at a people. Im not sure we need to bump that up but deftly bump up the penalties so [inaudible] have to pay more if they screw up i like to keep it at the higher level. I understand people and performing very well and with that hopefully will mean nobody runs into these limits. These are folks that have been getting a rate reduction and i think we really need to make sure the reduction that we water is greater than for people not getting that great benefit. Its a small increments. Just to maintain the integrity of the rates. So would you like to make a motion . Yes. Ill move ....