Are never sent to the senate, then was there ever an impeachment in the house . The mystery deepens. We will explore that here tonight. As for mitch mcconnell, hes fine with all of it. He doesnt need swamp attorneys to tell him that no charges, no trial, and no way will the corrupt radical dems be able to retain control of the house come november. No way will they ever stop President Trumps reelection. The president for his part still demanding a full trial, and the president is now accusing pelosi of looking for a quid pro quo. There it is, quid pro quo, with the senate. And hes asking why her party isnt impeaching her, but by hanging on to the two weakened partisan impeachment articles, Speaker Pelosi seemingly is trying to reel in her party of hate from the brink of their own destruction. Pelosi explaining today President Trump will be as she put it impeached forever if she just simply hangs on to those articles, for appeasing the rav ra vid radical members of her Democratic Caucus
Considers himself a king. Thats the newest, latest and greatest reason for democrats to impeach. Listen. When crafting the constitution the founders returned feared return of monarchy in america. Having fought a war of independence, they specifically feared the prospect after king president corrupted by foreign influence. They therefore created a constitutional remedy to protect against a dangerous or corrupt leader, impeachment. That this magistrate is not the king. The people are the king. He is a monarch, that is the accusation because of his sons name . A 13yearold kid who didnt ask for any of this, by the way, is being dragged into the political schiff storm if you will, by highly biased stanford law professor who clearly lacks warmth or decency. Give you within example that shows you the difference to him and a king of the constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. While the president can name his son barron, he cant make him a baron. [laughter]. Trish disgusting to do
The United States, they say, considers himself a king. Thats the newest, latest and greatest reason for democrats to impeach. Listen. When crafting the constitution the founders returned feared return of monarchy in america. Having fought a war of independence, they specifically feared the prospect after king president corrupted by foreign influence. They therefore created a constitutional remedy to protect against a dangerous or corrupt leader, impeachment. That this magistrate is not the king. The people are the king. He is a monarch, that is the accusation because of his sons name . A 13yearold kid who didnt ask for any of this, by the way, is being dragged into the political schiff storm if you will, by highly biased stanford law professor who clearly lacks warmth or decency. Give you within example that shows you the difference to him and a king of the constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. While the president can name his son barron, he cant make him a baron. [laug
Are never sent to the senate, then was there ever an impeachment in the house . The mystery deepens. We will explore that here tonight. As for mitch mcconnell, hes fine with all of it. He doesnt need swamp attorneys to tell him that no charges, no trial, and no way will the corrupt radical dems be able to retain control of the house come november. No way will they ever stop President Trumps reelection. The president for his part still demanding a full trial, and the president is now accusing pelosi of looking for a quid pro quo. There it is, quid pro quo, with the senate. And hes asking why her party isnt impeaching her, but by hanging on to the two weakened partisan impeachment articles, Speaker Pelosi seemingly is trying to reel in her party of hate from the brink of their own destruction. Pelosi explaining today President Trump will be as she put it impeached forever if she just simply hangs on to those articles, for appeasing the rav ra vid radical members of her Democratic Caucus
Then was there ever an impeachment in the house . The mystery deepens. We will explore that here tonight. As for mitch mcconnell, hes fine with all of it. He doesnt need swamp attorneys to tell him that no charges, no trial, and no way will the corrupt radical dems be able to retain control of the house come november. No way will they ever stop President Trumps reelection. The president for his part still demanding a full trial, and the president is now accusing pelosi of looking for a quid pro quo. There it is, quid pro quo, with the senate. And hes asking why her party isnt impeaching her, but by hanging on to the two weakened partisan impeachment articles, Speaker Pelosi seemingly is trying to reel in her party of hate from the brink of their own destruction. Pelosi explaining today President Trump will be as she put it impeached forever if she just simply hangs on to those articles, for appeasing the rav ra vid radical members of her Democratic Caucus and not allowing the senate to