reportedly a suspect. and they reportedly have surveillance video from the night of the incident showing hernandez there with two of the victim victims. . good to see you. great to see you. if there s truly an iwitness in this case, this would be a pretty heavy blow for aaron hernandez? it s a bombshell. because witness testimony is huge in a trial. as you and i know, we ve covered trials together. when witness say they saw the face of aaron hernandez pulling a trigger, that means you ve made your case. i can understand why this man has gone to fox locally under cover. because this man, hernandez, clearly has tentacles reaching out because people are refusing
him. for people to be shocked by this verdict, i m quite shocked by it. you re shocked that they re shocked? yeah. there are a lot of people commenting on this, that didn t watch the case or listen to the law. mark, your reaction? well, anyone who prosecuted a case, knew from the onset there wasn t enough evidence to get a conviction. it just got worse for the prosecution every day. what do you think, rod? i agree to a degree with mark furman. there wasn t enough evidence. the problem in this case is that the police chief said himself he was ordered to make an arrest. if that is the case, then why is it that this case was dropped, fumbled so much by the prosecution?
with the law. the chief lawmaker is questioning a jury verdict? pretty unbelievable. we have three guests here with us. i know the supreme court has ruled this is not double jeopardy. why does it feel like it? peter. it does feel like it. what it s indicative of is 15 months this investigation has been going on by the federal government so i want to know was there a coordinated effort between the state of florida and the federal government if there was a hate crime not to bring the hate crime charges in the state court. at the second time, why wasn t there federal charge brought initially all across the country where there are federal hate crimes or race crimes that involves death, they bring those indictmen
there is under this law to prove this. here s what i want to know, the same guy that wouldn t indict two black panther members? what about brian terry who died with a gun from operation fast and furious. now he has a civil concerns. seems a bit hypocrite particular call. i believe it is. the government has to say, let us look into this and prove whether there s enough or not enough. i don t think it s a called for investigation. the problem is it s creating a sense of divisiveness. on sunday night a group of aftrican-american men went afte a hispanic men and they beat him
iwitness and i would say even though they weren t necessary, the injuries. you mean what was the most important evidence in the case? yes. the eye witness of course whose testimony completely corroborated what george zimmerman said and also matched the ballistics, matched the medical examiner s testimony, not dr. bao s, but rather dr. vincent did i memayo. it all matched up. you did a good job in pointing out to the jury, this is not the same as everyday life. for those that maybe didn t hear it, explain that. the frustration that i have with jurors is they default to what we all do. they default to make a decision every moment of every day because you have to. that s a quick decision-making process. the criminal standard is so much higher than that. beyond a reasonable doubt standard we never use in our daily life. even getting married, moving, getting a job is compromising back and forth. the decision to convict somebody has to be beyond whatever you re used to.