for white house officials and biden s attorneys and it will also show that in the end, this was in their words, a mistake, an inadvertent one at that. however the attorney general made a supplement today so that white house officials were not aware of any events and he detailed timelines that none of us were aware of and underscore the fact that when the president first talked about the classified documents earlier this week, he committed a second set of documents we discovered last night. they knew about them, take a listen. the review was underway when you guys made a statement about the documents. there are views underway when the president book about these documents. i don t understand. it does not make sense. the reviews underway the entire time, dealing differences that the headquarters had information on the documents, and he chose to exclude it. until reporters get information on the second set. let me confuse you, for a second, phil. we are trying to do this by t
special counsel need to interview the president? i thought they have to, eventually. is that what the president says his attorneys have said to him don t inquire about what the documents are because the less you know, the better? that could be. it standard operating procedure when you are the subject of an investigation like this, you don t want to give your client any more information then he already had. you want to put him away and for services but it s. ultimately, this will come down to knowledge and intent. the joe biden but the documents? what was his intent? sure, you investigate other people around joe biden, but ultimately, i think you have to make an effort if you re doj to speak with joe biden. now, that could go the easy way, he could agree to it, that could go to a really difficult way, where there would be a subpoena and perhaps a fight in the courts, or could see a middle ground bill clinton, for example, one ken starr wanted to talk to him after a difficult negot