religious objection to providing contraceptive services as part of the health plan, the insurance company, not the hospital, not the charity, will be required to reach out and offer the woman contraceptive carefree of charge. dana: okay. the more i look into this, the more it didn t sound like much of a compromise to me at all. the administration was facing extraordinary and growing backlash. we have been talking about this for a little over a week. today, it was like two steps forward. then we went half a step back. a lot of people think it s a distinction without a difference. even calling it money laundering. what do you think? greg: i don t know. the employer now has to decide between offering a policy what has the provisions, or no policy at all. and you get fined basically. obama has thrown the baby out with the birth control pill. it makes no sense to me. at all. basically, it speaks to the tone deafness of this president, who has been living in a left wing bubble. with sebe
charity or hospital that has a religious objection to providing contraceptive services as part of the health plan, the insurance company, not the hospital, not the charity, will be required to reach out and offer the woman contraceptive carefree of charge. dana: okay. the more i look into this, the more it didn t sound like much of a compromise to me at all. the administration was facing extraordinary and growing backlash. we have been talking about this for a little over a week. today, it was like two steps forward. then we went half a step back. a lot of people think it s a distinction without a difference. even calling it money laundering. what do you think? greg: i don t know. the employer now has to decide between offering a policy what has the provisions, or no policy at all. and you get fined basically. obama has thrown the baby out with the birth control pill. it makes no sense to me. at all. basically, it speaks to the tone deafness of this president, who has been living i
dollars into a pile of dollar, what difference does it make? i think they re operating as a pack. you know how packs are. but the difference here is that packs disclose the money. let s go to the motive. i always like to know why. why would somebody overseas want to give to a congressional candidate in the united states? free trade? health insurers gave them money to run attack ads against health reform while claiming they were supportive of obama s efforts. wall street gave money to the chamber to fight regulations. it s a vessel is it money laundering? if the record proves anything is that people give them money
lab, or no one else gets anything. shelby claims the white house is biased because it s reportedly leaning to awarding the contract to boeing which is in the president s hometown of chicago. who knows, maybe he s got a point. so do we, though. when are we actually going to get a law that turns on the lights on all of the shenanigans that the politicians in this country pull against us. call it a kickback, call it money laundering, call it earmarking, call it back-door bailouts. i d like to call for the sunshine act. anyone? not in our congress. our next busted, accused criminals trying to run the show in illinois. democratic candidate for lieutenant governor refusing to drop out of the race even after news broke about his domestic violence arrest. he then pushed his girlfriend s head against the wall, holding a knife to her throat. police found bruises on her neck and hand. charges were dropped after she
others, exploiting these people to make some money this weekend in nashville? well, i think there s a certain expectation. i started this a few years ago, and then the last year i ve seen the political parties jump into the tea party movement. and because they tried to control this movement, what they did is basically fractured the movement. so most people are just unhappy with government. and i don t think that we should completely exclude the parties. i think we need to do that. but the focus should be on nonpartisanship. i think both political parties are responsible for the destruction of our government. i think i call it money laundering. they laundered your money and they go through these corporations and those corporations in turn give the money back to these people for their campaigns. we ll never solve the problems because they always have a special interest involved in the process. really, they need to give it over to the people. we need to tell them stop spending it all.