who will join us in just a minute. look at the laws he pushed together, a list of laws that hillary clinton very well would have broken and has broken. if it was you or if it was me or jay or monica who s going to join us, if we did a tiny fraction of what they did, we would be wearing a striped suit, sitting at a nice little tiny cell somewhere. there s the issue of the alt radical left in their bizarre ongoing conspiracy without empathy evidence ofco president trump colluding with the russians in the lead up to ndofthe election. comey has been more than forthcoming and that investigation of course. one democratic senator al franken asked about the russia collusion story, we don t comment on these things, watch. is there any evidence that the trump campaign assisted or directed those efforts? that s something i can t
no they haven t, even though they sometimes make the statements they ve closed the case, it s not closeav with prejudice. we don t know if it is possible that the fbi and department ofof justice have impelled a grand jury here, and are investigating this. we aren t hearing that. sean: doubtful. i would urge that this be looked at again with a new team in place to review the law and the evidence. the statement that james comey made about loretta lynch and how he was so concerned about how it was going to be perceived you know what he should be more concerned about?ttch has the law been violated or not? sean: last question we only have about 30 seconds, i m sorry. what about the unmasking? over 1900 americans in one yeary unmasked and we know seemingly that they were targeting the trump campaign at the time? don t forget susan rice who
statements to date leads that conclusion. how in the world was isth not prosecuted? what is the basis on which they decided that gross negligence which is extreme carelessness is not violated at a minimum? as a whole list of other statutes as well. i don t understand how in the world the department of justice department of justice and james comey with a straight face, he got mildly nauseous because someone accused him of interfering with a campaign? is that the new standard? mildly nauseous? this whole thing is making me more than mildly nauseous. sean: we don t even know if there s investigation about all the millions of dollars, monica, that were paid to the clinton foundation, these exorbitant,th double the normal rate fees, moscow speeches, bill clinton. all the people associated with her signing off personally, 20%t of american uranium going to russia.
was in violation of the law. couldn t prove any sort of criminal intent. sean: why isny james comey only revealing this information now and we are really supposed to believe that huma abedin has no idea that sending classified material to anthony weiner s laptop isn t a crime? aren t we supposed to protect that? how stupid do they think we are? he should, comey, at a minimum done a full investigation of huma abedin. president trump tweeted this, fbi director comey gave her a free pass for many badan deeds, the phony trump russia story was an excuse used by democrats as justification forde losing the election, perhaps he just ran a great campaign. clinton got a free pass and it so did huma abedin and that creepy anthony weiner guy. take a look at this on yourso screen, our friend jay sekulow