the purview of the executive branch and they want to do it anyway, tells us we have reached a staple that is very dangerous in this country. if the federal government is saying it may be illegal but we are doing it anyway and who is going to stop us? isn t that leading us to a place that we don t want to be? todd: i will go one step further. this isn t the irs. this want is the military. this isn t through an act of congress. this is the cdc that is doing this. how dangerous is it that an agency like the cdc with no real authority can do something like this with so little pushback aside from the biden administration saying we don t want to do this but we are going to do it? exactly. also the cdc has lost a lot of credibility. so, since no one believes them. they just say well, we re going to do this anyway. and, until they acknowledge natural immunity, it s going to be kind of hard to believe anything they have to say. jillian: all right.
holding up of military aid to ukraine would be a very bad thing. let me get your thoughts while i have you, congressman, on the so-called cease-fire in syria. the president says this is a great day for civilization. in your view, who are the winners and losers in this deal? well win mean, there s not much dispute about that, right? the president succeeded in getting the turks to stop shooting the kurds, our allies, the people who died alongside us in the fight against isis. the president succeeded in getting turkey to stop shooting them for, i guess, 120 hours. a cease-fire usually involves a negotiation between both sides. the kurds weren t involved in this negotiation. and the price of that apparent 120-hour cease-fire is that turkey gets to stay on land that the kurds have occupied for a very, very long time, in a country that isn t theirs. so again, it doesn t surprise me that the president thinks this is the greatest deal in human history, but it was yet another sellout of the
take over property that isn t theirs. so what do you do? well, actually, law enforcement in the first place, they are not going to call them terrorists because that s what they would love to be called. law enforcement is going to take a soft glove approach and take the sheriff s lead to not fan this into something it s not. they are stomping their feet to get someone s attention and the last thing law enforcement needs to do is inflame it so they won t and will take a patient approach to this. do you think they should face punishment, whether a confrontation or once they leave, should there be some, you know, some ramifications for what they have done? yeah, and eventually there will be. it just doesn t need to be escalated. indictments last for a long time. they can be indicted. they can have legal documents filed against them so they can
they did hurt the people of new jersey and fort lee and the person who needs to apologize is me. hurt the people of new jersey. hurt the people of fort lee. what do you think? he has a record of belitting or bullying people and wants us to believe this was a surprise to him. this is his record of administration for his entire career. let s talk about the comparison to president obama. when a real scandal happens. let s look at the definition of scandal. there are lots of foe scandals out there. when benghazi happened, our embassy was attacked, the president immediately said he would hold this accountable and investigate it. how is that working out?
and no one has been fired because of the health care website and in the irs scandal the people have been promoted. i think the closest comparison isn t the irs scandal. it is more the government shutdown and the president of the white house shutdown the word war ii memorial, that is a better comparison. has anyone been fired because that? here is chris christy addressing what you mentioned. there are plenty of times i get credit for little for what i have to do with and the opposite is true as well.