the president doesn t like congress. it s not a question of like or dislike, they will overturn everything we have done and do it quickly and violently. and violently. the president said, there is violence, his words, when you look at antifa. they are violent people with tremendous power. you were saying in this room, you have people that preach to almost 200 million people depending on which sunday we are talking about. that, from the president. let s get insight from our political and legal law enforcement. strong words from the president, predicting violence if the democrats take control of the majority of the house of representatives. he certainly isn t the first person to scare people to the polls. if he s asking these reverends and whatnot to do that, it s irresponsible to say that there s going to be violence if democrats take over. that s just that s not true.
and the white house still isn t answering questions about michael cohen. on the surface you would expect the white house to want to smack down any notion that someone close to the president was engaged in a pay for play scheme as michael avenatti, stormy daniels s attorney is indicating. but shrz referred all of those questions to the president s outside counsel. rudy giuliani says the president did not know about payments cohen can received. to be fair, michael cohen isn t the first person to capitalize on connections to people in power. sure. what s not normal though is that cohen was operating in secret, right, he didn t make his activity public by hanging a shingle as a will beyist. we still don t know exactly what cohen promised the companies, whether he was able to deliver or if he just duped various companies into thinking he was the key to navigating the trump white house when in fact he probably wasn t. u.n. one thing we know for sure is on a day when the white house
i thought he was insulting the president. one thing to ask tough questions, it s insulting. it s insulting if you think he had to do this and he s following the law. deporter in chief? it s a point if obama is saying i didn t have the power to deport these people i should be held accountable. the house and 60 democrats in the senate. they had an overwhelming majority in the house. now they re blaming house republicans for not holding a vote? i m not disagreeing with holding the president s feet to the fire and being tough on immigration the fact he did nothing in the house and senate after that speech. the president of the united states, you ve got some person in the media saying deporter in chief. this isn t the first person that said that. people in the president s own party have called him that. i appeared on the show called between two plants or between two ferns? he has reduced a lot of the decorum in the office in some ways just by the nature of the interviews he choo
them by any means, earlier american presidents, ronald reagan, i assume you re a great admirer of ronald reagan, almost 400 executive orders. there are executive orders and executive orders. but if you study some of those ronald reagan on george h.w. bush or bill clinton executive orders, you ll find that some of them are very similar to what this president is doing. so the question, the question has to be asked, if there s a republican president down the road, and you would like to see a republican president in the white house, if you go forward with this, are you concerned you would be narrowing the prerogatives, the executive authority, of a republican president down the road? yeah, to me, this isn t politically at all. we need to rein in and bring back the balance of powers. congress makes the law. the executive should implement them. you re right, i mean, listen, this president isn t the first person to stretch the bounds of what executive orders should be. but i think this is a