order, paul? well, what the judge said is that he s welcome to say whatever he wants in private and other people are welcome to say whatever they want in public. it s just that roger stone and his lawyers need to be circumspect. let me push you on that. this isn t a normal case. it is obviously all being covered every night. all of us in the media are covering it. the political forces are debating it back and forth. why should stone who has his neck in the potential meat cleaver here be the one who is not allowed to mount a public defense? the concern is about infecting the jury pool which means he may not get a fair trial. right now roger stone is acting as his own hype man and he s going to the court of public opinion because i don t think he has a defense in the court of law. but to shelby s point i feel you on that and you never want to be your own hype man. you want to do the verse and somebody else to echo it. exactly. except busta rhymes. he would record his own ec
people are welcome to say whatever they want in public. it s just that roger stone and his lawyers need to be circumspect. this isn t a normal case. it is obviously all being covered every night. all of us in the media are covering it. the political forces are debating it back and forth. why should stone who has his neck in the potential meat cleaver be the one who s not allowed to mount a public defense? the concern is about infecting the jury pool which means he may not get a fair trial. right now roger stone is acting as his own hype man and he s going to the court of public opinion because i don t think he has a defense in the court of law. i feel you on that and you never want to be your own hype man. exactly. except busta rhymes. he would record his own echos. i m going to press you on behalf of roger stone s argument which
beyond a reasonable doubt is that we have a standard in this country where we will let nine people who are guilty go free so that we do not convict one innocent. that s what the definition of beyond a reasonable doubt is. and jeffrey, you accept the jury virkts in other cases. why is this case different? why are people having such a difficult time with o.j. simpson when the jury has an opportunity to review the evidence, you had skilled prosecutors presenting the case, they made a decision. how come people can t accept that decision where we accept jury decisions in thousands of cases every day in this country. here s something no, i accept the jury s verdict. i recognize that was the jury s verdict. but i don t have to agree with it. i disagree with jury verdicts all the time. that doesn t mean that the jury verdicts are wrong. that s just my opinion about them. certainly it is that was the verdict in the case.
tell. i understand. any paperwork released after this date? the score, the ranking of why they let him go? we just distributed i did see it? i didn t get it, i guess. the traditions of parol i didn t get it. was there anything unusual about the amount of time they spent deliberating? no. for this type of a hearing. generally deliberations with smaller panels are shorter because you have fewer people. four commissioners, that was not it wouldn t be uncommon. what about the time of the hearing? how long it took to get to deliberations? this hearing was a little bit longer because of the amount of conversation that took place. four commissioners, we knew it would last longer. we expected that we would have a little bit more leeway. we would allow more leeway to allow information to get on the record. and they did want to take time to talk about how things are done because of the interest in the case.
give that answer today. maybe i missed it, did you answer the question whether you were going to tell us when and where he will be released? so, typically we don t give we don t give that information ahead of time. the inmate in general will know ahead of time when his release is, basically we give what s called like a locked in release date, but as far as announcing when and where he s going to be released, we normally don t do that. normally, this isn t a normal case. i would tell you, i don t believe we have any plans of doing that. but he d be here up until the final two weeks or so or three weeks, would that be safe to say? that would be safe to say. he ll remain in lovelock just prior to his release. would you make an exception? again, i don t believe we have any plans on doing that. and transferred to one of just closer to airports and public transportation you re saying or to populated areas? yes.