optimizing for content that gets engage men, a reaction. what its own research is showing that could be tent that is hateful, divisive, that is polarizing, it s easier to transpire people to anger than it is the other emotions. misinformation, angry content is enticing to people. very enticing. and keeps them on the platform? yes. facebook has realized that if they change the algorithm to be safer people will send less time on the site, they will click on less ads and make less money. haguen says facebook understood the danger to the 2020 election so it turned on safety systems to reduce misinformation. but many of those changes, she says, were temporary. as soon as the election was over, they turned them back off, or they changed the settings back to what they were before to prioritize growth over safety. and that really feels like a betrayal of democracy to me. facebook responded saying every day our teams have to balance protecting the right of billions of pe
the investigators, and then the results will be driven by the facts that are determined. follow-up, please. before the facts are in, is it helpful to your investigation for the president of the united states to use inflammatory language like people being strapped? let me just be very clear and repeat what i ve said. i am not concerned with respect to the integrity of the investigation. we know how to conduct an investigation with integrity. i served 12 years as a federal prosecutor. there were a great deal of comments in many of the cases that i handled in the public sphere and i know how to maintain the integrity of an investigation and this investigation will have integrity. mr. secretary, thank you. our title 42, title 42 expulsion sending haitians back to danger in haiti immoral? yes or no? no, they are not. driven by a public health imperative. and let me explain. because let me be quite clear. we do not conduct ourselves in an immoral way. we do not conduc
that the district attorney likely errored in exercising its jurisdiction to enjoin the u.s. use of the classified records in its criminal investigation. we agree. and there s more. the three-judge panel tears to shreds the arguments that trump and his lawyers have been making in public and in the court of law, that the records belong to him, or that somehow, at some unknown and unstated point in time, that he declassified the documents. also, from the ruling, quote, plaintiff, meaning donald trump, has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents. the plaintiff suggests that he may have declassified these documents when he was president. but the record contains no evidence that any of these records were declassified. in any event, at least for these purposes, the declassification argument is a red herring, because declassifying an official document would not change its content or render it personal. so even if we
it s been a long week for barclays‘ ceo jes staley and it ends with him fooled into replying to an email he thought was sent by the bank s chairman but was actually from a prankster. we ll tell you what he wrote later, but first we want to know have you ever sent an email to the wrong person? just use #bbcbizlive. hello and welcome to business live. we start in europe s economic powerhouse, because in the last half hour germany has released gdp figures for the first three months of the year, and they show an economy that s accelerating. it grew 0.6% on the previous quarter. that translates to an annual rate of 1.7%. it s being fuelled by global demand for the country s exports, like cars and machinery. but it s not all cause for celebration. let me show you why. last year germany clocked up its biggest ever trade surplus, that s how much more it exports than it imports. at $275 billion, germany has one of the biggest trade surpluses in the world. it s a source of tension wi
Office. we have an unprecedented threat climate. not just for the fbi, but for nara, for the irs, for doj. the things he says that sound inane and stupid, because they are, whip up his supporters and endanger the lives and the safety of public servants. yeah, absolutely, nicole. and that s what s concerning. that is the point. when he goes on truth social and has a picture of him with a qanon pen and saying winter s coming or whatever the nonsense is, it is whipping up this conspiracy theory. he s trying to find a new base of support of these crazy conspiracy theorists, some of whom are inclined to violence. and if you look at sort of the non the social media that isn t facebook, that isn t twitter, things like patriots.win and other 4chan things that are not mainstream social media sites, you see an increasing prevalence of very violent rhetoric. and that s by design in trump s case. i think all of this again, to