a former president. i mean, indict a former president. he used federal money to do that with no underlying crime here. he couldn t state that at the press conference. when we try to investigate, he says no, no, no. we re going to take you to court. the guy we want to talk to hasn t worked for alvin bragg for a year. he wrote a book on this very subject. we kind of want to know, too, was there any involvement with the biden justice department, with the white house and how this worked out. so those are the questions we have. this is i think alvin bragg is obstructing our investigation, our constitutional duty to do oversight. martha: here are some thoughts on that from josh gerstein and why bragg might not want mark pomeranz to be publicly questioned. watch. i think the concern is that if they did get pomeranz on the witness stand or in a deposition that we might see a lot more of the inside baseball within bragg s office being spilled out
or more employees is expected in the coming days. it will require employers to provide paid time to get the shot and paid sick leave for effects from the shot. they paused the requirement for police officers. the fraternal order of police has been locked in an ugly battle with lori lightfoot for weeks now. both sides need to hash the issue out at arbitration because the officers are unionized. they said the union is not interested in having a discussion. they ve not done that. we offered multiple times over the two months that we attempted to bargain with them. what they are serious about is obstructing, objectfuscating an leading members astray. in new york city 2300 firefighters called in sick yesterday.
this makes the choice even more underlying issue of corruption clear. will the senate hold a clear and it s not clear how successful they would be. trial or enable a cover-up? but for trump s opponents, it is we know john s opinion on this a potential approach that has in that he doesn t think this led to the ousting of heads of they re going to hold a fair states when the odds seem trial. stacked against it. neera, what do you make of it? will we actually see any of short of influencing the impeachment trial itself, it s these four individuals from mark something that could have esper to mulvaney to bolton broader political impact on the testify? and who do you think is the best 2020 election in november. to tell this story? next, one more thing special to i mean, i think what s the beat. the beating? stunning about the new york go to hilton instead of a travel site and you ll experience times story is that reporters are able to get the facts and a whole new range of emotions like
with an impeachment proceeding. you know, i think you have got to weight facts before you vote. but, i m very concerned about, you know, how this has been done. dana: one of the things the president just wrote a letter to nancy pelosi and john roberts reported that in our hour. he says that this is cheapening the whole point of impeachment. i think that s true. and i was kind of surprised the house came up with the articles of impeachment they did. abuse of power? come on. obstruction of congress? every president congress thinks oh well, you know, the president is obstructing us. i would have thought they would have at least made it obstruction of justice. why they didn t do that i don t know. dana: i would ask you, sir, if you could stay with us. senator schumer is actually speaking right now after their senate lunch. let s go him to and come back to you. republican senators too many of them are intent on helping him hide it. it appears leader
we re very proud of it. it s transformational in so many ways which i ll go into if you wish me to. i don t know. i ll tell you this. there are many court cases, and some reporters keep saying why don t you wait for the court cases. we have the court cases because the president is obstructing justice by appealing everything to the courts and then the courts have ruled in our favor overwhelmingly, appeal it to a higher court, and now some of those cases are up to the supreme court, and then we ll see how long they will take to respond. so some of that information, if the courts will see, again, first, second levels have come out in our favor, some of that information may be out by the time the senate takes up the case, if in fact we do impeach the president in the house of representatives, would be some of that information might be so i think it s very clear