round of drama around rosenstein about the did he say that we should invoc was it the 27th amendment? 25th. 25th amendment, sorry. does he wear a wire? i always wondered, was there going to be a chance the deputy attorney general could sit down and go this is two entities the president has had lots of twitter anger for. colliding with one another. i thought there was a decent chance he would come out in a f feud of the new york times. fair enough. that came on the heels of the new york times op-ed, you know, anonymous oftnone op-ed. we know that those two things got under the president s skin, right? has he forgotten? can we believe that? i don t believe he s forgotten it, but he tends to be
invoc invoked civil rights. he said, look at the american revolution, the anti-slavery movement, the women s suffrage movement, the sifrl rights moomt. all of these struck a moral chord with the american people. they all sought to overcome an injustice. and we are, too, seeking to right injustices that are holding us back. that describes the koch brothers idealogy pretty well. they don t want the government to play a big role on things whether it s the economy, environmental regulations or also being for criminal justice reform. so tamron, this is really consistent with their libertarian idealogy, but it also makes for very strange bedfellows. absolutely, and we have the new poll out. tomorrow at 5:00 p.m. eastern is the cutoff time and we ll know who makes that debate stage. how much protest do you think we ll see by 5:00 p.m. tomorrow by those who don t make the cut on the main stage. tamron, you ll see a