Live Breaking News & Updates on Investigations Yermak
Stay updated with breaking news from Investigations yermak. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The whistleblower made falseht statements, the whistleblower got caught with chairman schiff. Remember chairman schiff, the person that the democrats instead of the House Judicial Committee which has spent a full week on this, thats not who has been in charge. They put in charge was the person that got caught with the whistleblower. Have you spoken directly with the whistleblower . No, we have not. Wed like to. That wasnt true. The person that said he had evidence of the first fake impeachment scam, collusion with russia, had evidence of that collusion and didnt have it. The person who in the course of that read into the record the steele dossier because the people needed to know what happened about the truth of what happened. We heard about the truth of what happened with the steele dossier this week when the Inspector General said it was all garbage, rubbish, a ....
Just now, and i believe in 1998 but certainly in 1974, pointed out crimes and impeachable offenses are different things. there are crimes that may not be impeachable. impeachable offenses which may not be crimes. an impeachable offense, a high crimes and misdemeanor is a serious offense against the constitution, the structure and function ofti government. i would defer to you the federalist papers. i would also say one other thing. we ve o repeatedly heard that t democrats areha accusing presidt zelensky and mr. yermak of lying because mr. zelensky said president zelensky said he wasn ten pressured. of course he said he wasn t pressured. the united states is a powerful nation on which his nation is dependent. he has a gun to his head. the gun is the fact that the president of the united states upon whom he defends for military aid, for help in many different ways, has shown ....
Yermak in kweks vice president pence s visit to warsaw and a meeting with president zelensky. six people having four conversations in one sentence. yermak talks with sondland, sondland takes with morrison, morrison talks with taylor and we have the democrats saying there s a quid pro quo and need to impeach the president. what they t forget is what mr. gates brought up, yermak talks with sondland, sondland talks with morrison, morrison talks with taylor. two days ago, the guy who started it, yermak said it didn t yehappen. that s their guy, mr. sondland, had to file the addendum to his testimony, hado to write this sentence to clarify i think this is amazing. this is the clarification. ambassador taylor recalls mr. on september 21st, 2019. yermak is the key here and it didn t happen. he just told us that. ....
Evidence clearly established that specific criminal acts were committed. these guys don t have that here. they know hit. you know it. it s not on paper in the resolution in article one or article two. it s in nothing that s been said in the last two hours. these facts don t change. this is a completely unprecedented single party impeachment charade and everybody at home can see that clearly. these things don t climate change and they won t. i yield back to my friend. i yield to my friend from florida. i thank the gentleman for yielding. no evidence, quote. when time asked yermak if he thought there was a connection between u.s. military aid and request for investigations, yermak was adamant. we never had that feeling. we did not have the feeling this aid was connected to any one specificai issue. i seekif unanimous consent to enter this time magazine ....
Released ujless investigations werele launched, why is he not here? when asked if he thought there was a connection between the aid and the investigations yermak stated he never had that feeling. we were told they would figure it out. after a certain amount of time the aid was unfrozen. wes didn t have the feeling th aid was connected to any one specific issue. if you ignore this evidence and you were in a court case, you d lose your law license for allowing a case to go forward without this exculpatory evidence being provided to the defense. it s so ridiculous to me that we are not taking time to look further into this. i want to yield to mr. collins, the ranking member. i appreciate so much the gentleman from tennessee. he answered a ton of questions about hisa understanding of prs and theatrics by his study of ....