means before day ten. i have no knowledge as to whether this occurred in this case or not. this confirms that there were indeed communications issues between horizon and the data centre at this time. however, it should have had no impact on data recorded locally within the branch, provided all operational processes are followed correctly. all historical data should have been sent back to the branch from the data centre as normal. i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs from the period to see whether there were any issues or any justification in the claim that this resulted in a apparent system losses of £3000, as claimed. those final words in that final sentence, i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs, do you consider that to be a fair and accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e mails? it accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e-mails?- have seen in those e-mails? it looks that wa , have seen in thos
News News: The UPSC conducted the NDA-1 written entrance test on April 21, 2024, for admission to the Army, Navy, and Air Force wings of NDA and INAC. With an ex
Bottom half of paragraph 182 and into 183. nevertheless, as the post office concedes this was a horizon 0ffice concedes this was a horizon case and the prosecution case was relying on data generated by horizon and yet there was nothing to indicate that any fidgets you audit data was obtained at the time of the criminal proceedings and there was no evidence to cooperate the horizon evidence, issues raised by miss mcdonald were not investigated and there was no proof of actual loss as approved to horizon generated shortage. the post office concedes that her prosecution was unfair but we conclude that the prosecution was an upfront to justice. i would like to look at her interview that can be found at uk gi 0001489. in this case, you were the interviewing officer. are we to assume that the
Horizon system was working? this the defendant had to accept that the horizon system was working? ben horizon system was working? as i said, i believe horizon system was working? as i said, i believe it horizon system was working? es 1 said, i believe it has horizon system was working? is i said, i believe it has happened. horizon system was working? as i | said, i believe it has happened. as it happened in a case you were involved in? i it happened in a case you were involved in? involved in? i can t say for definite involved in? i can t say for definite that involved in? i can t say for definite that it involved in? i can t say for definite that it has, - involved in? i can t say for definite that it has, sort . involved in? i can t say for| definite that it has, sort of involved in? i can t say for- definite that it has, sort of thing. but in mr thomas s interview, he did say he didn t like the horizon system, because he kept getting error notices, which indicated he was
And her professional progress, doubtless reflection the mac reflecting her trustworthiness from counter clerk to permit sub postmistress. it s says the post office conceded it wasn t there but we are bound to conclude the prosecution was an affront to justice. i would like to look at the transcript of interview in her case, 00112971, please. thank you, and turning to page three. yet what the interviewing officer in this case alongside a colleague diane matthews, correct?- alongside a colleague diane matthews, correct? ~ , , , alongside a colleague diane matthews, correct? ~ ,, , matthews, correct? miss matthews was the lead investigator. matthews, correct? miss matthews was the lead investigator. can matthews, correct? miss matthews was the lead investigator. can we matthews, correct? miss matthews was the lead investigator. can we start - the lead investigator. can we start b lookin: the lead investigator. can we start by looking at the lead investigator. can we start by looki