makes sense to me. first of all, a subpoena and a search warrant are not mutually exclusive. you could execute a search warrant and simultaneously hand the person a subpoena for the same records. meaning regardless of where they are, we want them back. and that we want them back piece is so important to my other point to the question you just asked. we want them back means we want them back regardless of how we get them. and if we have to get a search warrant to get them back, then so be it. if you don t trust the person with the subpoena, because the subpoena simply says hey, rachel, here s a subpoena for your stuff, when you get around to it, or at least by the date that the grand jury is meeting, give us the stuff. there s indicia of trust, right? maybe under investigation, but we re allowing to you give it to us on your timetable. that doesn t happen in the search warrant. we need this stuff, we want this stuff, the fact that the stuff is out there, can do grave damage to the nat
0 2022 and they are going to google at the thought of what your life must be like. they will goggle at the thought of what it must be like to see something like this happening in your lifetime in realtime for the first time ever in american history, having no idea how it would how it would play out. nothing like this has ever happened before. and we don t know how it ends. tonight s news, that the fbi has raided the home of the immediate past-president of the united states, it feels both astonishing and sort of inevitable in equal measure. before republican president donald trump, we never before had a president impeached twice in a single term. we ve never had so many members of a president s own party vote not only to impeach him but to convict him and remove him from office and bar him from ever serving in office again. we have never before had a president reject the results of the election that did remove him from office, we never before had a president summon his followers into a