On a remote monastery in the 1940s, so the backdrop is the second world war. And the monastery is being presided over by a nun, who i play, whos officiating mass, the priest is dead. And one night, unceremoniously, a young indigenous boy is dumped on the doorstep of the monastery to be cared for as part of the reprehensible Government Policy of assimilation of indigenous children, in order to separate indigenous children from their culture. And this powerful spirituality of this young boy destabilises the surety of the catholic faith there, and these strange miracles start to happen. Which we see so vividly in the performance by this little boy, by aswan reid, just nine years old, and you cant take your eyes off him when hes on screen. Hes absolutely magnetic. Erm, i mean, we were so lucky to find him. I remember warwick. Warwick thornton and i started to have these conversations over the pandemic, as a lot of people did, you know, and he was talking about this story, and he said, but
Incuriosity of republicans. if you have multiple women who are saying there is a combination of drink and forcing o oneself on them, it seems like there is not an interest of exploring that pattern. we are using a lot of talk about criminal justice here and what it would take to convict brett kavanaugh of a sexual assault beyond a reasonable doubt. you know, certainly, he s not entitled to having all charges against him proven beyond a reasonable doubt when what we re doing is assessing the wisdom and judgment and putting this individual with a lifetime tenure on the supreme court. he s entitled to a presumption of innocence, but the senate doesn t have to demonstrate every charge to a degree of certainty. you have sworn testimony from an individual saying judge kavanaugh sexually assaulted her that long ago.
Saying, case closed. and then this woman, veselnitskaya, comes out and says, well, wait a minute. yeah, i was an informant for moscow, and i was setting up that meeting. and, yes, it was about exchanging information like dirt on hillary for lessening the sanctions. it seems to me they re getting right near the target zone, proving collusion and maybe the president s personal involvement beforehand as well as afterwards. an accomplice before the fact, not just afterwards and try to spin it away. and they say we re not interested. the incuriosity is incredible. i mean this blocked number is a perfect example of how very valid leads were not followed by the republicans. why didn t they ask if he was talking to daddy. the democrats were pushing, get the phone records. they wouldn t do it. isn t it obvious to all of us that donald trump would have been read in on this meeting? his son, his senior aides are going to have a meeting with russians. he didn t know about it? i m going to sa
Veselnitskaya comes out and says, well, wait a minute, i was an informant for moscow, and i was setting up that meeting, and yes, it was about eveninxchangi information like dirt on hillary for lessening the sanctions. it seems to me they re getting right near the target zone, proving collusion and maybe the president s personal involvement beforehand, as well as afterwards. an accomplice before the fact, not just afterwards, in trying to spin it away. and they say, we re not interested. what do you make of the republicans? the incuriosity is incredible. this blocked number is a perfect example of how very valid leads were not followed by the republicans. why would they the democrats were pushing, get the phone records. let s figure out who made this phone call. they wouldn t do it. look, isn t it obvious to all of us that donald trump would have been read in on this meeting? his son, his senior aides are going to have a meeting with rup russians and he doesn t know about it.
Quote steve bannon, he s lost it. your reaction? well, look, i m not in any position to make a judgement on the president s mental acuity or whatever. i spoke with a source today who is close with the president and said, look, this isn t a question of that, this is a question of competence. he said that s terra firma to talk about. you can t to talk about competency, the way the white house is run, you want to talk about the chaos, you want to talk about the president s incuriosity, attention span, anything else, that s fine. i think that is, you know, that s a question that we have been discussing for a very long time here. and steve bannon s judgement may be one thing and, again, he knows the president very well. he s operated with him. he also went on tv the other day and said the president s a great man and bowed down to him again. so paying homage at one point, saying he s lost it at another. so, you know, i think that what we ought to focus on is talking