veselnitskaya comes out and says, well, wait a minute, i was an informant for moscow, and i was setting up that meeting, and yes, it was about eveninxchangi information like dirt on hillary for lessening the sanctions. it seems to me they re getting right near the target zone, proving collusion and maybe the president s personal involvement beforehand, as well as afterwards. an accomplice before the fact, not just afterwards, in trying to spin it away. and they say, we re not interested. what do you make of the republicans? the incuriosity is incredible. this blocked number is a perfect example of how very valid leads were not followed by the republicans. why would they the democrats were pushing, get the phone records. let s figure out who made this phone call. they wouldn t do it. look, isn t it obvious to all of us that donald trump would have been read in on this meeting? his son, his senior aides are going to have a meeting with rup russians and he doesn t know about it.
quote steve bannon, he s lost it. your reaction? well, look, i m not in any position to make a judgement on the president s mental acuity or whatever. i spoke with a source today who is close with the president and said, look, this isn t a question of that, this is a question of competence. he said that s terra firma to talk about. you can t to talk about competency, the way the white house is run, you want to talk about the chaos, you want to talk about the president s incuriosity, attention span, anything else, that s fine. i think that is, you know, that s a question that we have been discussing for a very long time here. and steve bannon s judgement may be one thing and, again, he knows the president very well. he s operated with him. he also went on tv the other day and said the president s a great man and bowed down to him again. so paying homage at one point, saying he s lost it at another. so, you know, i think that what we ought to focus on is talking
efforts by the people on your own committee, the house intelligence committee and obviously under republican control to essentially start a kind of series of bizarre world investigations into the seven-year-old uranium deal of the clinton campaign, et cetera. yeah, well it was a great deal for the russians yesterday on capitol hill. they scored major victories when it was announced that three new investigations would be launched to go back in time and look again at hillary clinton. the best thing for the russians is they seek to undermine our elections in 2018 would be further disunity, but for us, the house democrats on the intelligence committee. we ve seen these plays run before. we re not caught flat footed. we re going to county to charge ahead. are they acting do they believe what they re doing or acting in bad faith? i believe they re being obstructionists. i can t speak to their motives. i never will, but if you just look at what they re doing, it s an incuriosity at th
the house democrats on the intelligence committee. we ve seen these plays run before. we re not caught flat footed. we re going to county to charge ahead. are they acting do they believe what they re doing or acting in bad faith? i believe they re being obstructionists. i can t speak to their motives. i never will, but if you just look at what they re doing, it s an incuriosity at the very least about what russia did and i think worse, they re serving as a accomplices to further undermining of our democracy. does the revelation that it was in fact the clinton campaign and the dnc paying for the research through gps, sort of law firm to christopher steele as he collected this information, does that change your assessment of either the credibility of document and the allegations contained therein or the possibility of trump colluding in the campaign
scenario type for channeler and the president. wash on that. it takes libya off the front page but then again it wasn t on the front pages in the first place. the main stream media who spent hundreds and hundreds of articles on the supposed outing of a c.i.a. agent in the bush administration, ensconced in washington and never in danger. epidemic of incuriosity about murder of an ambassador. so that is also a wash. lastly, will it disrupt early voting? which is what the obama administration wanted? states like virginia or ohio? there is no storms in northeastern ohio, democratic country, as was indicated earlier, virginia, it hitsteamic area and republican arizona. it s probably a washington. it will be a three-day hiatus out of the political counter and will resume in week where we were in the beginning of the week. what about the romney evideneffort and how it transpid today? holding this evident to raise