Live Breaking News & Updates on Including Obstructing Congress
Stay updated with breaking news from Including obstructing congress. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
were convicted today of seditious conspiracy. it s a rarely used, often difficult to prove charge. a fifth member was acquitted of seditious conspiracy, but he has been convicted on other very serious charges, including obstruction of an official proceeding and assaulting an officer. but today s verdict means so far 14 people, including members of another far right group, the oath keepers, have either pleaded guilty or been found guilty of conspireing and plotting a violent overthrow of the united states government. this victory by the justice department, while it is a milestone and a massive and hugely consequential federal investigation into that plot to overturn an election and overturn democracy on january 6th, only underscores questions about holding accountable the man, who the vice chair so memorably puts it, quote, some in the mob, assemble the mob and lit the flame of this attack. we re talking about the disgraced ex-president himself. as the washington post ....
Them to walk in the door, i do think there s some connective issue on the issue of violence. but there s some evidence of that already. but if you want to try to get into what exactly happened at the willard hotel shortly before january 6th? we don t still know from this trial. it wouldn t have been an sshl part of this trial. what was roger stone talking about? there s no way he s cooperating that s not a source for either congress or for the prosecutors. you think there s any chance mark meadows is cooperating? i can t say for sure, but think the answer is no. i think it s a small enough place we would have heard that. i think he likely has asserted ....
Who believe that the supreme court should have the same ethicals standards as everyone else and congress can act. i don t see any other way. the supreme court will not do it themselves. i hoped maybe john roberts would speak on this. he chose not to. that s the only avenue here. barbara, let me show you what kim is talking about. here is john cornyn making exactly that point. i know harlan crow and clarence thomas. they are both honorable men. this is part of a 32-year smear campaign that started with his confirmation hearing. i played the video for people who don t remember it. he referred to it as a high-tech lynching. he has been targeted because he was a conservative black man to undercut the legitimacy of the supreme court. he is being targeted because there are failures to disclose ....
In the mob, assemble the mob and lit the flame of this attack. we re talking about the disgraced ex-president himself. as the washington post reports, 15 weeks of trial, prosecutors allege that the proud boys on trial saw themselves as trump s army. inspired by his directive to standby during a september 2020 presidential debate and mobilize by his december 2020 call for a wild protest when congress certify the election. the men sought to keep trump in power through violence. donald trump has made the insurrections themselves, pledging to pardon them and featuring imagery of the vien lent crimes they committed a at his opening campaign rally in waco, texas. a combustible collision of forces, the rule of law and donald trump. that s where we start today. ....
Hearing this week was this public education piece. i think the public intuits something is wrong. the public approval rating has plunged farther and faster than any institution in american civic life. the public doesn t understand they don t have the same ethical codes of conducts including other branchs, including federal judges. clarence thomas isn t abiing by what is there. talk about the role of congress or doj in making sure the public understands the basic functions of the court and the people who govern us. yeah. one thing that i took away that i think is important from the hearing this week, before the senate judiciary committee on supreme court ethics, is that judge ludig, he is the person who mike pence consulted before january 6 to ensure that he had no other choice than to certify those election reports. ....