Importantlyjudge Kaplan News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Least two different interpretations of this clause, one is the very broad interpretation that prince andrew s lawyers are relying on, but the other is a much narrower interpretation of that clause, and that would involve any potential defendants that could specifically have been named in this lawsuit that virginia giuffre brought against jeffrey epstein in 2009, so the argument there is it is a much narrower category of people come and importantlyjudge kaplan said as with all private contract law, the thing that matters is the intention of the two parties who signed that contract. i was very interested when judge kaplan said jeffrey epstein is not here to tell us what he intended in that document, and implicit in thatis in that document, and implicit in that is that the only party who is here to tell us what she intended is virginia giuffre and that s going to this point that prince andrew wasn t a party to this document, he is not named in this document, he didn t ....

Prince Andrew , Virginia Giuffre , Jeffrey Epstein , Thinkjudge Kaplan , Contract Law , Importantlyjudge Kaplan , Wasnt A ,