Live Breaking News & Updates on Implication Being|Page 5
Stay updated with breaking news from Implication being. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
They re doing their job properly by attending to his needs, protecting him, looking out for him, clearing him, telling him who they voted for and everything else. it seems to be something he does frequently is test everybody out and say are you with me? are you here for me? and nobody else. not understanding that that s a grossly inappropriate thing to say to somebody from the justice department. many though in congress are with the president and are doing his bidding now by talking about releasing the memo, talking about the missing texts between peter strzok and lisa page, and talking about a secret society that was floated apparently in a text message, not homer simpson stonecutters. there was a problematic text lost in that. it was that peter strzok insinuated that he didn t want to be part of the special counsel because in his gut there was no there there. he was only interested, the implication being, in taking down the president. james galliano, former retired ....
Obviously the wind at this president s back has been the tax cuts that seem to be the gift that keeps giving even amonday left-leaning ceos. they re sharing the unexpected loot with workers even in ways the white house didn t envision. i m wondering if something like this that has people sort of worrying about are we going to sort of go tit for tat, see the world get nasty at us and you know how it goes. i worry about it particularly because later this week the next round of nafta negotiations go forward. the president is saying nafta is a lousy deal with the implication being that it s because our partners, canada and mexico, by less from us than we buy from them. that s not true with canada. we buy less in the form of goods than canada but if you add in the services, we run about a $12 billion trade surplus with canada. ....
Israel which took place in december 2016 during the transition you may remember this, this is a resolution that chastised israel for the continued building of settlements in the occupied territories which the u.s. abstained on which was big news at the time for the u.s. to do that. we know that during that time, jared kushner, the president s son-in-law, had conversations with israel about that resolution that israel reached out to jared kushner, advising the incoming president for help on that resolution. of course, president obama was the president at the time, leads the u.s., gave approval for there to be this abstention, president trump coming in, the implication being, israel saying, perhaps will you have a different approach to this? we know jared kushner had conversations with israel about that resolution as well and that would be, as we look at this plea agreement, michael flynn apparently lied about conversations he had with the russian ambassador about that ....
Was dangerous and two sitting senators said that the president of the united states lies. not only to the american public, but to foreign leaders, and as a result it has put our country in peril. and those senators go in that room and they applaud the president. because what is important to these senators is that they want to get tax reform done. and flake made the point, how important is your agenda when it comes to larger issues about the presidency or the values of this country? and i don t know that anything will change as a result of this, but i certainly think this is a historic moment in our nation s history. certainly nothing that we have ever witnessed. you know, biana, senator flake said he will not be, in his words, complicit or silent. the implication being, of course, that other republicans are right now being complicit and silent in the face of all of ....
True statement. today in his testimony, the new acting director of the fbi mccabe indicated that that would not be standard operating procedure to inform a person, whether they were or were not the subject of investigation. if it were true, what we flernld the president was that he ner initiated the question. that he asked comey whether he was under investigation as part of a job interview. that s not illegal but is it inappropriate? totally inappropriate. the idea is comey says i m willing to serve, i m willing to continue to serve and the president in considering that says am i under investigation? clearly the implication being, if i am, i don t want you. well, i don t know whether that happened original. what we do know is that president trump no longer wanted him because he was engaged in an investigation which clearly ....