says, that should be an aspirational goal of the judges, because we are all concerned about the legitimacy of our institutions, and particularly at the institution of our judiciary. how would you as a judge when you are approaching your decisions how do you try to avoid being seen as a policymaker by embracing doctrines like substantive due process, which essentially gives judges part bond to do whatever they want. well, senator, i ve not had that particular situation, but i do have a methodology that is designed to avoid my impartation of policy perspectives. judges are constrained in our system as part of the
0 christianity, judaism, islam, embraces traditional definition of marriage, correct? i am aware that there are various religious faiths that define marriage in a traditional way. do you see that when the supreme court makes a dramatic pronouncement about the invalidity of state marriage laws, that it will inevitably sit in conflict between those who ascribe to the supreme court s edict and those who have a firmly held religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman? woman? well, senator, these issues are being litigated, as you know, throughout the courts as people raise issues. i am limited with what i can say about them. i m aware there are cases i m not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide to, i m just asking isn t it apparent that when the supreme court decides that something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right, and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court s edict, particularly in an area w
either. so how do you make sure biden administration rigorously enforces the law and corporations like nike and apple don t exploit the loopholes? for answers we turn to stephen mosher, author of the bully of asia and foreign affairs analyst walid phares. thank you for being here. stephen, even the president of the u.s.-china chamber of commerce made if he doesn t know how they will implement this law or enforce it. if are you confident they can? no, i i m not confident the biden administration will enforce any laws passed by the u.s. congress, quite frankly. we ve had laws on the books, raymond, banning the impartation of goods made with slave labor since 1932, prison labor. it was passed because of the use of prison labor, slave labor in the soviet union to keep those goods out of the united states. i testified two decades ago before the senate foreign relations committee about goods that were flooding into the u.s. even then. so these laws exist.
the travel traffic light system is being replaced with a single red list . fully vaccinated people will no longer need a pre departure test before returning from non red list countries. professor lawrence young is from the university of warwick. he says the new testing regime raises concerns about how new variants will be detected, with the new requirement for fewer tests. this is inevitably going to result in people bringing back more infections from abroad and you could say actually given the high levels of infection we already have in the country perhaps that is not as much of an issue. the key issue has to be the impartation of variance. we know that previous waves of infection have been driven by travellers returning to the uk. and look at what we are facing now with a delta variant that originated in india. so we must let our guard down. it is important we keep genomic surveillance going because we know