Soldiers. And saturday a conversation with justice alina kagan at her alma mater, princeton university. Here is a look. To hearing that you see on tv is the tip of the iceberg as he went around, i think i did 82 of them. What was striking was how many of them, republicans and democrats, wanted to talk to me about the second amendment. But with the kinds of rules, there are at least whirls about what i could say because then they knew that they could and asked a very direct questions about these particular cases. So the proxies were along the lines of do you hunt. And i went through these interviews and my answers were so pathetic. And do you know anyone who hunts . Not really. [laughter] and so i was sitting down with one of the senators from idaho who has a ranch and is a great hunter himself and he was telling me all about how important this was with many of his constituents and i totally understand why. And so when i was feeling a little bit punching, it was late in the day and i sa
Due, for china it is almost one but that is going to james. Change. Not all this is sustainable none of this is sustainable. The radical position is that we can boycott and we do that against her know that was catching dolphions. Reject a lot of practices because women said we are not buying it. I do not want to be responsible for killing dolphins, period. That we go, the more educated we are, women, vote with your dollars. Thank you very much. [applause] up next on cspan, journalists discussing religion and the Supreme Court. A conversation on crime and guns from the Group Connecticut black republicans and conservatives. And later, the Renewable Energy summit with discussions on climate change, water shortages, biodiversity, and largescale farming. On the next washington journal, kevin on yearend strategies to prepare for filing your 2014 taxes and tax provisions taking effect next year. Deeperwill talk with woods of usa today on College Sports and efforts to unionize of usa berkowitz
Its hyper linked to our cite at the communicators. I was interested you included the daily show. Why did you do that . Weve seen in the last years of asking about Media Consumption and where people turn for news that people are getting news and Current Events from those late night shows. And so we did want to include them to get a sense of who is turning to those and where they fall in the mix. I was surprised to see the daily show tends to be quite well trusted. Im looking here and it looked to be about fifth or sixth down on this chart here with liberals. And even a satire program is right in the middle there. Do you really think that the liberals when they go to these sites they are only getting their news from these sites or other places as well . There are a mix of outlets people tend to go to. Why y do the liberals have more of a mix than the conservatives . We didnt ask people the why question. But it is consistent when you look along the line of the audience profiles of that au
Case, to determine how long they stay in prison it might be five years, it might be three whatever the case is, you have to make a decision based on the crime and what the potential is for them to recommitment. When i looked at these determinations, a large part of it was the weapon involved in the crime. So it could be a simple drug case that may have been a situation where someone was actually not actually involved in a violent offense but they happened to have a weapon in the car. Or during the process of the crime, they had a concealed weapon with them. So therefore, immediately the crime itself escalated in terms of what the penalty would be. And so even in our determinations for a person for parole, we had to look at very clearly whether or not there was weapons. As a matter of fact, because we have such a large prison populations, we even had examiners that would look over the case and we made our decisions initially by file. If there was a weapon, there was a star, an asterisk
These proxies and the proxies are on the line of, so do you hunt . [laughter] and i went through countless these interviews and my answers were so pathetic. No. Do you know anybody who hunts . Ot really. I was sitting down with one of the senators from idaho who has a ranch and who was a great hunter himself and he was telling me about his hunting and how important this was to many of his constituents and i totally understand why. Why many senators would want to know these kinds of things. And so i was it was late in the day. It was my 93rd interview. I said you know, senator, if you would like to invite me hunting, id really be glad to come. And this look of abject horror passed over his face, you know . And i realized, ok. I think ive gone too far. Senator, i really didnt mean to invite myself to your ranch. But i i i will tell you that if im lucky enough to be confirmed ill ask my colleague Justice Scalia to take me hunting. I grew up in new york. I didnt have this experience. But i