they would lose the case and t is susan amount that was t said period bonn.or what did o rash now? finn mac guide to zero ruth hef five days to think the range that was given letere spin if there is a strong recommendation that should be pursued. ai s him when both day estimate we will see you in mccourt. he said 25,000 was a close at this hat presumably come and must have been used tori authorize. but i believe the authorization of mr.crone was much, much lower with respect to the legal settlement which is 10,000 pounds. it is important to try to be to fair, they had already attempted to settle the case at a number of lovell s fifth four they came to me at the yes they have lesser amounts if you wear green two or the higherleun amounts for with a had a given up a sit-in revelation this demand but there was the 150,000 i did not increase as 300,000 and that was not at myr. authorization nor do i have been a record i have looked quite hard to find any records of the other
have recognized marriage between same-sex couples, he has changed his mind. the american people are changing their mind about the propriety, the power, the desirability of same-sex marriages, and the powerful powerful role models they can be. with this step tay, we me steady progress because we are moving on our national fabric. we took one important step forward towards removing that stain on our nation s history. we will hear from mr. bloom and fall and then answer any questions. thank you chairman leahy and thank you for your leadership as well as senator feinstein. i am deeply in debt to both of you and my colleagues. today s step forward strikes a blow for liberty on behalf of the citizens of new york, the citizens of connecticut, the citizens of california, the citizens of all states where same-sex marriage is legally recognized. the loss of those states will now be accorded equal status in comparison with the loss of other states. today is a win for all americans
company and future discrepancies? will you make sure this does not happen again? at the time, certainly at the time, i received assertions that the police had closed their case, but internal investigations had occurred, that two people have been successfully prosecuted and went to jail, and so forth. it was seen as a matter that was in the past. accountability had been delivered. the police had successfully prosecuted their case and closed the investigation. there was no reason. the settlement matter was within mr. hanson s authority to make custom to make a judgment on. your father was very concerned about the case. why was he concerned? concerned about the settlement? i was not concerned? concerned about the settlement? what were you concerned about the goodman case? at news corporation at the time. norma you do speak to your father now and again. i do not think we discussed the it news of the world matter,. the goodman case was unusual matter. apart of
what s the risk of? this case is already about. the link is already known about. there is no one else involved. but if the company, as those described to me there was clear evidence the company would lose the case. there didn t seem any point in taking it all the way to court. and taking it on if the company was convinced it would lose the case. there was a amount of damages that were possible. rather than go through that it was reasonable to avoid that expense. did you discuss reputational risk to the company that might came out of a case like this because i don t recall that specifically it would be recalled as matters of the past and wasn t seen as a matter of, it would have been desirable not to have all these things dragged out. as i testified to in july, i wasn t aware at the time there was any confidentiality or anything out of the ordinary in terms of the confidentiality. but i think i wrote to you in aug
Transcripts For CSPAN U 20111110 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.