and the republicans are playing harder ball than the democrats. the democrats are more respectful of procedures and rules and that sort of thing and the republican come in abboom, playing for power and they have used this tactic, delay, delay, delay. and it s not only stretched it out where they could justify not asking the president to come in but frankly today s hearing would have been much more impactful two or three months ago. the long stretch of time between when people forget the details, hazy, they move on intellectually, i thought the democrats from that point they had a steeper hill to climb today than they would have if they had done this earlier. evan there is the sort of owow when you read the written responses which of course we hadn t seen for so long, right. you know, you read all those, i don t recall, i don t remember. and it does seem to be a joke. and yet it appears that he, you know i don t know the right word but he got away with giving an interview like that
harry, what about the fact that he decided controversially not to subpoena the president and force the issue, perhaps, because of time conflicts or perhaps because of pressure from rod roseinstein. we don t know why he didn t try to interview him beyond those 20 questions with all those i don t recall, i don t remember answers. we don t. it s probably the first response for historians to address. but on wednesday, all of that, they ignore. they ve got more than enough to do, just trying to get it s not even his impressions. was this obstruction just the facts. they re pretty damning if you actually hear them. particularly damning as i was watching ari melber s wonderful, beautifully constructed hour, the summary last night. susan, the russian interference, the way the russians interfered.
inquirer. so we should point out hicks says this evidence does not contradict what she says and her attorney says she stands by not knowing about the hush money payments in october. we showed just a couple exams, did hope hicks lie? that s a tough one, the reason it s tough, she was very, very careful in the words she chose. when she testified before the house committee, those words matter, to use words like, i don t recall, she used that qualifier, no direct knowledge, even the word, i wasn t present. for any conversations. that kind of excludes phone calls. exactly. she was very careful, and also the evidence that the southern district of new york had at the time, those were toll records, it s great circumstantial evidence because it shows contacts between the relevant parties, it doesn t show the substance of those calls. so it s not proof?
for the midwestern and swing voters and that essentially is why he s in this race. he is going to push back and i m a little surprised that kamala harris is playing the race card this early in this often. i don t recall, say president obama, doing it this early and in the contest but one reason is if you re playing in the progressive lane there is little else to distinguish you other than playing the gender card or race card and so forth. that s why she s out there doing it and it seems to be working. paul: dan, quickly, elizabeth warren surpassing bernie sanders and some of the polls. why? because elizabeth warren is present in herself with plans and a lot of ideas she wants to quote unquote, reform corporate america. bernie sanders is now clearly running as a purebred socialist, capitalist socialist. that is making a lot of people, including democrats nervous that bernie would have no way to form a government or enact the stuff
fasenra may cause allergic reactions. get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth, and tongue, or trouble breathing. don t stop your asthma treatments unless your doctor tells you to. tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection or your asthma worsens. headache and sore throat may occur. haven t you missed enough? ask an asthma specialist about fasenra. if you can t afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.