person to be charged in connection with the insurrection according to one count is a former president and a current front runner for the nomination of a major political party who is already facing 74 criminal counts. who stands accused of trying to defraud the government that he led at that time. trying to obstruct the proceedings of a branch of government and trying to overturn the will of millions of voters in the swing states that determined the outcome of the electoral college. the big question now that trump has been booked and fingerprinted, what s next in this case? which is really unlike any other in american history. here is what team trump has planned according to the new york times. his lawyers used the arraignment to hint at one of his central defense strategies, a request to delay a second pending federal trial for months if not years. delaying the proceedings as much as possible is widely expected to be part of mr. trump s legal strategy given that he could ef
So it s just who he is. i think this dark, brooding figure, right, who in some ways is kind of indicative of not only an element of the republican party, but a large segment of it we could see him for who he is. and so the reboot was just trying to figure out, how do we rebrand? but it s still the same product. i think we need to be clear about that. i m just so struck by the fact that we all keep waiting for this moment where one of them decides, hey, i m looking at the same polls you are all looking at, i recognize that i will not be able to win this race the way that i have been trying to win it, and now it is time to say the truth, to call donald trump out for what he is, and that is not the reboot that we are seeing from any of these guys. eddie gloud, david jolly, as always, thank you for your time. we ll be right back. that. i started cosentyx®. five years clear.
Up. the supreme court has made clear that it s able to be punished, even though the main tool is speech. the ddoj here is going to argue that trump s case is the same. it will point out that the indictment here is for participating in a large-scale conspiracy, an electoral fraud, and for entering into agreements with other people who were a part of planning that criminal activity. we wouldn t expect that some of the evidence there would be communication, would be speech, but that wouldn t involve any imposition on anybody s freedom of expression. the doj is for sure going to want to be cautious here, and i think they have, recognizing it s a politically sensitive case, but a great body of first amendment doctrine and all of
Transcripts for MSNBC Deadline White House 20240604 21:36:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
If you are the federal judge in this instance, do you provide that opportunity? i will say this, neal, glenn and i have practiced in federal court for several years. federal court is not fake court. i have a lot of respect for state court judges it s where i cut my teeth but federal court has a level of decorum that has to be respected and the judges are not going to take any bleep from any criminal defendant, especially somebody like donald trump. i think we ve already seen that. we ve seen an admonishment from the magistrate judge saying you better mind your ps and qs, mr. trump, in terms of what you do, in terms of influencing witnessing, et cetera. i think they believe it, alicia, i think it s what their client wants and i think we all should have this opportunity to witness history in the making especially when you consider the fact that this was donald trump s attempt to steal the outcome of the 2020 presidential election from all of us. to invalidate what were legal votes that w