Weve got to look at for eight months e were doing this so i think following procedures is something you have to look at time is expired if he wishes. He doesnt wish. Good morning. The president who had no role in the white house asked you to deliver that message to Attorney General Sessions the president could have picked up the phone himself at any time and called the Attorney General. The president also had a full staff of executive employees right down the hall. So this made me wonder if the president thought what he was doing was legal why didnt he
just pick up the phone and call the Attorney General Sessions or why not ask any member of his staff who worked right down the hall to deliver a message . It is clear to me that he went to you is because everyone said no so i want to ask you about that. Two days before meeting you, the president called white House Counsel mcgahn on a saturday to fire the Special Counsel saying and you can see that on the screen, mueller has to go. Call m
Him through this committee for eight months. So i think following proceed sure is something that you have to look at because your idea is not really point of order. The time has expired. If he wishes. He doesnt wish. Good morning, mr mr. Lewandowski. Im questioning you right now. Thank you. The president asked you who had no role at all in the white house to deliver that message to Attorney General sessions. The president could have just picked up the phone himself at any time and called the Attorney General. The president also had a full staff of executive employees right down the hall. So this made me wonder. The president thought what he was doing was legal, why didnt he just pick up the phone and
call Attorney General sessions, or why not ask any member of his staff who worked right down the hall to deliver a message . It is clear to me that the reason he went to you, mr. Lewandowski, is because everyone said no. So i want to ask you about that. Two days before meeting you, the pre
obstruction of justice. cover a few more. under the emoluments clause. did the first and only president rich enough to largely self-fund a successful presidential campaign ever admit to you that he secretly ran for president to get rich? no, sir. okay. he s already very rich. did do you have any information or evidence, mr. lewandowski, about crimes the president committed for or during congressional subpoenas as a basis of impeachment? i do not. how about dangling pardons? do you know if the president, did he ever admit or say to you he would pardon anybody in law enforcement who was trying to enforce or protect our territorial borders? at the request of the white house, i can t discuss private conversations. that may or may not have occurred with the president. how about this? impeachment by using a sharpie on a hurricane weather map? did the president ever admit or
impeachment under the emolument clause. the first and only president rich enough to largely self-fund a successful presidential campaign ever admit to you that he secretly ran for president to get rich? no, sir. he s already very rich. do you have any information or evidence, mr. lewandowski, about crimes the president committed for ignoring congressional subpoenas as a basis of impeachment? i do not. how about dangling pardons? do you know if the president did he ever admit or say to you that he would pardon anybody in law enforcement who was trying to enforce or protect our territorial borders? at the request of the white house, i can t discuss private conversations. how about this one? how about impeachment by using a sharpie on a hurricane weather map? did the president ever admit or say to you that he intentionally committed an impeachable high
on a hurricane weather map did he say to you he sbepgsly committed an impeachment high crime by magic marker as some democratic colleagues are conte contend? again, i can t discuss. i m sorry, you re frankly not being help at all. maybe you don t understand the party of impeachment, they re not picky. they don t care if you don t have impeachment, if you ve got anything on donald trump, how about justice kavanaugh because this morning, now they want they want to impeach him. have you got anything? he s a good man listen, i know you re disappointed you ve only been here four times but don t think there s going to be another opportunity because this committee has become the search party for impeachment and they re going to bring back anybody they have to to keep this hoax alive. i yield back 15 seconds over time.