Stay updated with breaking news from House rule. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
as this judge in new york just found. stand by. i want to go back to kaitlan collins who has been following the trump story for a while. what do you think, kaitlan? is this really going to have an impact on trump? is he going to continue to make these statements attacking various officials? reporter: i ve talked to people in his orbit as these gag orders have been imposed. the one in washington is on a temporary hold, it appears. i posted this question. is this something he can abid by. he doesn t listen to the advice. it is something they skirt around often. they would reath didn t say anything at all. at the would rather he didn t speak to reporters or going on truth social. we know this well. donald trump and who he is and what he does. what is different is that we re seeing him face consequences for the first time. and showing it is different when you walk into a courtroom and saying something than just posting it online or complaining about something. the line ....
replacement in sight. repeal and replace is going great. and racial bias, excessive force and reckless shootings. today s doj report on the chicago police department when all in starts right now. good evening from new york, i m chris hayes. there is just one week to go until donald trump becomes the president of the united states. he has not even taken office yet and already trump is historically unpopular. his transition, arguably clouded by more serious scandals and controversy than all eight years of the obama administration combined. as questions mount about the circumstances of trump s election and his alleged ties to a foreign adversary. democrats appear to be reaching a breaking point. in an interview with chuck todd, georgia congressman, civil rights icon john lewis became the first to declare openly what i believe many lawmakers have until now only suggested. i don t see this president-elect as a legitimate president. you do not consider him a legitimate p ....
matt: agreed to be here. kennedy: will be back tomorrow at noon eastern. now, here s harris. harris: let s begin as we await the start of a much-anticipated house judiciary committee hearing. president trump s former campaign manager, corey lewandowski, is such testify at any moment as the democrats ramp up their impeachment investigations. you are watching outnumbered overtime. i m harris faulkner. now we will hear the chairman and ranking member giving the opening statements. but there is already friction inside the room that you are looking at right now, after the white house moved to limit the scope of lewandowski s testimony and ordered two former aides not to appear before this committee panel. chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge is live outside that hearing room on capitol hill. things starting to get really busy in there now. that s right, harris. i m just looking over my shoulder because we are still waiting for corey lewandowski. we were told 20 ....
robbery that s burglary, i ll get it right. and in this situation you ve got somebody really caught in the middle of it, and that doesn t excuse the person from the consequences. professors, we ve talked about abuse of power and bribery. when we started we said we would also discuss obstruction of congress. so i would like to ask you some questions about obstruction of congress. professor gerhardt, in your view, is there enough evidence here to charge president trump with the high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of congress? i think there s more than enough. as i mentioned in my statement, just to really underscore this, the third article of impeachment approved by the house judiciary committee against president nixon charged him with misconduct because he had failed to comply with four legislative subpoenas. here it is far more than four that this president has failed to comply with. and he has ordered the executive branch as well not to cooperate with congress. th ....
to exclude from trial? therefore, from the american public evidence. i mean, we re prosecutors, we are used to evidence. that s how we measure our cases, measure our progress. and if senator mcconnell has decided in coordination with the white house that it s going to be run in a particular way to exclude facts and evidence and witnesses an documents what does that make the senate? it is just an amazing point for you to be making. america s history is being an advocate around the world for the i think it is fair to call that a banana court, a banana republic, a kangaroo court. we used to be a country that helped bring the rule of law to other countries. so impeachment wasn t designed to be a trial like in an article 3 court but it was designed to be a process and a high mined one in which facts mattered. right? the framers had this fascinating trial. you could have put an impeachment trial in the judiciary. they didn t want to. theoretically, the house, the house had the ....