inquiry yesterday. he was asked was he more cautious, 7 inquiry yesterday. he was asked was he more cautious,? l inquiry yesterday. he was asked was he more cautious,? he more cautious,? i continued to re ect he more cautious,? i continued to reject your he more cautious,? i continued to reject your characterisation - he more cautious,? i continued to reject your characterisation of - he more cautious,? i continued to reject your characterisation of this as overreaction, because that implies that i thought the action should not happen. what i thought should not happen. what i thought should happen is that people should be aware that without action very serious things would occur, but the downsides of those actions should be made transparent. i don t consider thatis made transparent. i don t consider that is incorrect, and i don t think. sir patrick was in a sense seeing exactly that, the advice we gave was identical, but the debate we had about this was how do we get the b