to make new ideas real. it s the cloud from at&t. with new ways to work together, business works better. hear my dail commentaries on the mike huckabee. get deat mikehuckabee.com. charles grobin has starred in movies and been in radio talk shows. he is helping people who are overcharged by the criminal justice system. ryan hole was convicted of first degree murder for a burglary. holly didn t kill the victim and was notine near the crime scene. he was sleeping at home. but he lent his car to friends and they used it to drive to the scene of the crime.
although it didn t address the question how the child went from being a child to a body. that might have been a better witness for the defense. saying in the midst of bad witnesses for the defense. absolutely. i ll tell you why please, ma am, let me tell you why, i think you are right. roy kronk has testified that he took his meter reader stick and he moved that skull around. as a matter of fact, he said he stuck his meter reader stick in the eye of the skull. what is significant about that? the medical examiner has testified that the manner in which the skull was set up, led her to believe that to say this was a homicide. now we know roy kronk has compromised that crime scene. greta: thank you all. unfortunately, this trial or fortunately, we ll have another night, thank you all.
what do you think is happening? well greta, i think jose baez was trying to create the for instance that somehow mr. kronk the inference that somehow mr. kronk had knowledge of the location and/or control of the remains of caylee anthony. at that time he first called she had been at that location for she been decomposing at that location between 46 and 50 days. he s trying to make that inference. the detective and all of his colleagues did nothing wrong. perhaps the deputy didn t find what mr. kronk called and later came out and searched didn t see it. in this situation, mr. kronk finds the remains and that s the most important discovery. i m sure there was a little excitement. he s not a professional this is a once in a lifetime occurrence. and i don t think he said anything, because it wouldn t make any difference now. greta: the way i look at it,
what do you think is happening? well greta, i think jose baez was trying to create the for instance that somehow mr. kronk the inference that somehow mr. kronk had knowledge of the location and/or control of the remains of caylee anthony. at that time he first called she had been at that location for she been decomposing at that location between 46 and 50 days. he s trying to make that inference. the detective and all of his colleagues did nothing wrong. perhaps the deputy didn t find what mr. kronk called and later came out and searched didn t see it. in this situation, mr. kronk finds the remains and that s the most important discovery. i m sure there was a little excitement. he s not a professional this is a once in a lifetime occurrence. and i don t think he said anything, because it wouldn t make any difference now. greta: the way i look at it,
criminal. two, he probably knew he was going to get the answer. i don t think he thought the father was going to confess on the stand to accidentally drowning the daughter. it is not what he said, it is what happened. he cried at the end of the case, when the jury is going to be making a decision this weekend. that counts more than anything the man said. i was compelling from two of the people we heard in the courtroom. greta: while her father is crying the defendant accused of being a cold blooded murderer is sitting there, holly didn t see the tears. and the jury makes similar observations. right, look at her sitting there click a pen. symptomatic of somebody that might be a sociopath. very sad and tragic the whole thing. greta: diana, this grief expert. have you ever seen a grief expert in court before? was there any argument or debate whether such a thing is an expertise that a jury needs help with?