Stay updated with breaking news from Holding t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
This president so he probably could sell in what what would be a folding by him. he could sell it as a win because that s what they want to see. so there is a meeting tomorrow. i think we ll hear more stories from folks like that tsaman who you talk about this idea of temporary pain, when you have to pay your mortgage or fill your tank with gas to get your-to-your job that doesn t feel temporary and for somebody like that it could have long term consequences so we will get more stories like that and not just in washington but all over this country. rick, the president three weeks ago in front of chuck schumer when he calls in cameras with the face-to-face with nancy pelosi when he got riled up and said he would take the mantle of it being a trump shutdown. today that seems like he s done a 180, he was like make it s a schumer shutdown, a pelosi ....
Class people. now i do, including people who work for the tsa and there are bad stories out there and it s unfortunate and i feel for people like the gentleman you profiled who s worried about paying his bills, that is a real reality. i will say this, though. it s temporary pain, it will be rectified and that temporary pain is to prevent permanent pain that millions of americans have faced because of our essentially open borders policy. by that i mean dealing with dangerous illegal aliens and competing in the work force with illegal alien workers who made people lose jobs permanently not temporarily so there is the near term pain is very unfortunate but it s to prevent long-term pain. as the president painted himself in a corner, nia? even senator lindsey graham says if the president gives in on wall funding it s probably the end of his presidency. in many ways lindsey graham is holding t ing thing the pain ....
A fantasy that s always been a rhetorical trope and not a security policy, the pain will builds. you ve seen guys in the senate. i spoke to a chief of staff who was beside himself because they re up in 2020 and they re worried that this is impacting people at the state level and they re blaming donald trump for it. steve, there was a deal with congress voted on this, they had a plan to continue funding and then the president backed out. how can it be anything but his shutdown? well, listen, i m glad the president did if, in fact, he was willing to make that deal. we don t know that, that wasn t on the record but if the reporting is correct it s good he did. i think he was reminded by people like me, people who worked for him so ardently in 2016 that this was the foundational promise of his campaign. he has been a promise keeping president since the day he got ....
Holding t but we think a private entity holding it would be even worse. it opens it up to privacy concerns across the board. there is no such oversight. the reason that decision was important, it looked at all the oversight issues in the ruling in the judges opinion. very important. there s another ruling that direct directly disagrees. he said this is probably going to get overturned. why? 15 judges, 36 rulings, all of them upheld that this program is lawful and meets the fourth amendment test. and then you have hundreds of appellate decisions since maryland v. smith that uphold the underpinnings that these are business records, no names, no addresses. that, i think, san important distinction. i think the foundation of the legal argument is there, and what we have here is you re going to take away the safety of what is well overseen, locked away in a vault, very, very ....
Holding t but we think a private entity holding it would be even worse. it opens it up to privacy concerns across the board. there is no such oversight. the reason that decision was important, it looked at all the oversight issues in the ruling in the judges opinion. very important. there s another ruling that direct directly disagrees. he said this is probably going to get overturned. why? 15 judges, 36 rulings, all of them upheld that this program is lawful and meets the fourth amendment test. and then you have hundreds of appellate decisions since maryland v. smith that uphold the underpinnings that these are business records, no names, no addresses. that, i think, san important distinction. i think the foundation of the legal argument is there, and what we have here is you re going to take away the safety of what is well overseen, locked away in a vault, very, very ....