changes. you are short on ears and long en masse- changes. you are short on ears and long en masse. that changes. you are short on ears and long en masse. that sounds - changes. you are short on ears and long en masse. that sounds like i changes. you are short on ears and l long en masse. that sounds like new york to me- long en masse. that sounds like new york to me- say long en masse. that sounds like new york to me. say it long en masse. that sounds like new york to me. say it again? long en masse. that sounds like new york to me. say it again? short. - long en masse. that sounds like new york to me. say it again? short. you| york to me. say it again? short. you need a hard york to me. say it again? short. you need a hard r- york to me. say it again? short. you need a hard r. you york to me. say it again? short. you need a hard r. you are york to me. say it again? short. you need a hard r. you are short - york to me. say it again? short. you need a hard r. you ar
will lead to another 9/11. steve: i mean all of these things that were said, it s not isolationism. it may not be exactly what people like that and the elites wanted, different than what they wanted, but you can t say. it s not isolationism. he made that clear when he was asked by the new york times on the trail, are you an isolationism, he said, no, no, no. are you america first, yes, i m america first. responding to the the new york times question. he s believing we re the most powerful country in the world we re going to do what s in our best interest. it ears transactional, focused on powerballe power and it s gon results. we ve got better deals when they could have taken us to the wto and probably could have won. and he will probably succeed as well in nafta. the problem that you have is that long term does that work. first of all with the china
will lead to another 9/11. steve: i mean all of these things that were said, it s not isolationism. it may not be exactly what people like that and the elites wanted, different than what they wanted, but you can t say. it s not isolationism. he made that clear when he was asked by the new york times on the trail, are you an isolationism, he said, no, no, no. are you america first, yes, i m america first. responding to the the new york times question. he s believing we re the most powerful country in the world we re going to do what s in our best interest. it ears transactional, focused on powerballe power and it s gon results. we ve got better deals when they could have taken us to the wto and probably could have won. and he will probably succeed as well in nafta. the problem that you have is that long term does that work. first of all with the china
but for right now, take a look at dr. ben carson who i think is going to get donald trump a run for his money in iowa and new hampshire. he s the candidate that s catching a little seem as well. one quick point which is that you kind of look at these nbc/marist polls and you see weakness for both parties. it ears early but this is a fire alarm poll for hillary clinton with 60% unfavorable ratings in both iowa and new hampshire, states that have voted democratic in five of the six past elections. on the other hand, if you re a republican thinking beyond the republican primary, donald trump is looking at unfavorability ratings approaching 60% in both states and only a third viewing him favorably. in the quinnipiac poll, only a third of americans said he had the temptment to handle international crisis. and jeb bush is looking at high unfavorable ratings as well. so what else do you have back on the shell there have at a point where americas are deeply unhappy with the direction of
courtroom, and you will see many defendants who are hanging themselves and i mean that figuratively by what they post on twitter, what they post on facebook. we are generating for the price of participating in social media, people are generating evidence that will be used against them later on and this is maybe the classic example. not the first online live shooting, that goes back to lee harvey oswald. it s continued to happen since the 60s. i want to hit up that social media thing that you just said because this is such a prominent part of the story. brian, you ve been able to find out the social media presence of bryce williams. it ears fairly new. you re making an interesting point about people who inadvertently leave evidence. in this case he seems to have reason is methodical about this. you look at his twitter account, it was set up a week ago with dozens of pictures from his life, from his past. i would surmise seeing that, that s someone who might be thinking about ge