server. but as of right now didn t know about anything that shouldn t have been shared. but during the election he went after hillary clinton about using her private server. we know hillary clinton can t be trusted. you take a look at her email situation. can we trust her with our security? clinton s response height of hypocrisy. are you surprised? no, i m not. i don t think they care about the practices for this thing. they think they can get away with whatever it is they do. and it would be smarter to have it done the correct way but that hasn t mattered in the past. and it is a difference of degree from hillary. but if you ve based your entire campaign on this, just do the right thing. one of the things that hillary clinton was being hammered for, nina, was allegedly attempting to get around federal acts where the government controlled t and one
agrees with christie if this thing s over, no more prosecution talk of hillary clinton. now watch giuliani. i think it s a tough decision. i think it s a tough decision, because you have to weigh what chris is saying, which is, it s been a tradition in our politics to out things behind us. toer on the other hand, you have to look at, how bad was it? because suppose somebody comes along a year from now and is allege to have had stolen $50,000 from a charity and she was never investigated for hundreds of millions. i don t know what the right answer to that is. i think it s a tough one that should be given a lot of thought and it shouldn t be an off-the-cuff answer. the equal administration of justice is one of our most important principles. so he s saying that hillary clinton can t be let off the cuff for stealing hundreds of millions did anybody say she stole hundreds of millions of dollars from a charity? did anybody ever say that? that she benefited from the charity, but i don
he wants to send, that the republicans want to send at this point? well, i don t think the issue should be james comey s behavior. he has clearly been presented with new information and he s doing his best to provide justice. it s indisputable that the president put a lot of pressure on the fbi by declaring before their investigation was complete that mrs. clinton was innocent and, of course, i ve already discussed the behavior of the attorney general. he in the face of all of that is trying to do the right thing, but i would say that this is the really big issue. if mrs. clinton is elected, she will be the first woman president and she will also be the first president in the 21st century to be impeached. she is facing investigations by the house regarding perjury and obstruction of justice. now the ongoing look at her
can be easily black mailed. oh, my goodness gracious. weiner gave put the nation at risk. i have ten seconds. i have to i have ten seconds. i have to give mr. boldin a chance to respond to quickly. there s a lot to respond to. the bottom line is this server was not huma abiden s server. hillary clinton can t be responsible for that. look for the senators or the ones who wrote that letter to take some action monday possibly even putting forth even having hearings and calling comey to the front of a senate committee to even look at this. my goodness, this campaign has gotten even crazier, and that would be a first. there s a lot of scrambling to do with nine days left before this election and a lot of people yet who have to go to the polls wondering what they re going to do. this is why that the letter, the damage of the letter, because now it s going to that action is going to be a reaction, if you will. you could have hearings and
job. he told congress that he would not reopen the investigation despite many demands that he do so because he told congress on that date testifying that mrs. clinton had lied when she said she did not send classified information on her private server, but now obviously there is new information and he has an obligation to do his job and complete this investigation. he said it is not polite sized. he said the fbi would not have re-opened this case at this time if it was not a most egregious criminal offense. what evidence is there to support that? certainly he would not have reopened this without compelling evidence that he must continue the investigation. and re-open is a questionable term. but donald trump says most egregious criminal offense. again, i m still waiting for evidence. there was certainly egregious criminal offenses because what came out before congress is mrs. clinton violated the law by using a private server, by