they re trying to show you there s a clash between law and a very certain candidate, because the week has now begun, and these judge us unanimously ruling a president could be tried for an election and the states try to bar that same candidate for similar conduct. so what is the distinction here? well, trump lost this appeal yesterday because he s not above the law. he is below the doj and jack smith when it comes to his own conduct and being accountable for it and even if he also, as a matter of job history, once oversaw the federal government including the doj as president. so that case is back on track unless the supreme court weighs in. the case is about rather random states and local judges can simply decide and announce that trump committed insurrection before he even goes on trial. in other words, is it constitutional and fair to ban candidates and basically decide elections that way? i ll tell you right now, most legal experts do not see precedent for colorado to beat
white house. federal officials are now reportedly running dna and finger test on a small bag of cocaine to potentially track down the culprit. the white house at the cocaine was found in a heavily traveled area of the west wing. the secret service tells fox news the drug was located in a cutter used by staffers and casb are the investigation underway for four days, one law enforcement officials familiar with the situation is already telling politico it is highly unlikely that a corporate will be found. really? meanwhile, president biden wasn t at the white house when the bag discovered but still keeping quiet on the whole situation. an white house press secretary karine jean-pierre with a barrage of questions about the cocaine discovery to which he answered, none of them. what is preventing a visitor from bringing an anthrax or something into the white house? i totally understand the question, but it is under investigation. does the white house support the prosecution
- [announcer] do you have an invention idea but don t know what to do next? call invent help today. they can help you get started with your idea. call now 800-710-0020. the travel nightmare that began before christmas is still not over. pamela brown here in for anderson tonight, and when we left you last night, southwest airlines ceo is apologizing to all the passengers stranded by all the flights the company canceled due to the weather and it s just a meltdown. well 24 hours later, there are about another 200 2500 reasons to apologize, as it about 2500 more cancellations today and nearly as many tomorrow. and it s gone to the point that southwest has been busing some people from airports, as far away as new york s laguardia and denver to houston. details now from cnn s gabe cohen. tens of thousands of travelers still weathering southwest meltdown without a clear and insight. i am hungry, i am exhausted, i just want to go home. the airline canceling more than 2500 fligh
pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time. pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time, what pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time, what does pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time, what does he - pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time, what does he need. pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re. short on time, what does he need to do? bill short on time, what does he need to do? . . short on time, what does he need to do? ~ . . , , ., , do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, do? all dictate the premise or s tactics. i ll do? all dictate the premise or s tactics. i ll say do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, i ll say that do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, i ll say that we - do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, i ll say that we will - do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, i ll say that we will be l tactics, i ll say that we will be consistent over the next two weeks, pay less consistent over the next two weeks, pay l