Regulating, getting fees, actually having somebody in charge of regulating the industry on january 1, seemed like a good idea. But im not wedded. There is no deal for me. I mean, i was just hoping to get something set up so we could show that we fulfilled the promise of 64. But, you know, if we continue, will we get there . We have legislation in front of us. It is the land use issues that have stuck, that weve gotten stuck on. So why dont we just work on that today . I sat through, you know, i dont know how many hours of both rules and planning. And the rules piece seems like there are changes, but in general, its been pretty people seem fairly comfortable with it. But we wont be able to get to equity if we dont get through this planning piece. I agree with supervisor safai, is there some way we can make sure the pipeline is filled with equity participants . I have no i think we heard talk the first 30, two years, we only take equity applicants. Or three years. I think there is a seve
Any questions. Weve tried to be transparent with the department of dbi and planning to move this forward. I think the issue before you is actually a very, very simple issue. As i understand it, this is an appeal from the categorical exemption of seekwa, it is not a rereview of everything that went on before the board of appeals and Planning Department. There is a lot that has gone on that you are not privy to. I will address the two questions by the supervisors just recently as i go through this, but the log does not support the appellant, the law says if they have done proper analysis and there is substantial evidence that supports them, and there is no new construction or major changed condition, then theyre findings are supposed to be affirmed and thats what the law says. The facts of this case actually support irving that the planning everything that the Planning Department has said and that this is categorically exempt. This hearing is about the categorical exemption, not everythi
Regulating, getting fees, actually having somebody in charge of regulating the industry on january 1, seemed like a good idea. But im not wedded. There is no deal for me. I mean, i was just hoping to get something set up so we could show that we fulfilled the promise of 64. But, you know, if we continue, will we get there . We have legislation in front of us. It is the land use issues that have stuck, that weve gotten stuck on. So why dont we just work on that today . I sat through, you know, i dont know how many hours of both rules and planning. And the rules piece seems like there are changes, but in general, its been pretty people seem fairly comfortable with it. But we wont be able to get to equity if we dont get through this planning piece. I agree with supervisor safai, is there some way we can make sure the pipeline is filled with equity participants . I have no i think we heard talk the first 30, two years, we only take equity applicants. Or three years. I think there is a seve
Any questions. Weve tried to be transparent with the department of dbi and planning to move this forward. I think the issue before you is actually a very, very simple issue. As i understand it, this is an appeal from the categorical exemption of seekwa, it is not a rereview of everything that went on before the board of appeals and Planning Department. There is a lot that has gone on that you are not privy to. I will address the two questions by the supervisors just recently as i go through this, but the log does not support the appellant, the law says if they have done proper analysis and there is substantial evidence that supports them, and there is no new construction or major changed condition, then theyre findings are supposed to be affirmed and thats what the law says. The facts of this case actually support irving that the planning everything that the Planning Department has said and that this is categorically exempt. This hearing is about the categorical exemption, not everythi
Regulating, getting fees, actually having somebody in charge of regulating the industry on january 1, seemed like a good idea. But im not wedded. There is no deal for me. I mean, i was just hoping to get something set up so we could show that we fulfilled the promise of 64. But, you know, if we continue, will we get there . We have legislation in front of us. It is the land use issues that have stuck, that weve gotten stuck on. So why dont we just work on that today . I sat through, you know, i dont know how many hours of both rules and planning. And the rules piece seems like there are changes, but in general, its been pretty people seem fairly comfortable with it. But we wont be able to get to equity if we dont get through this planning piece. I agree with supervisor safai, is there some way we can make sure the pipeline is filled with equity participants . I have no i think we heard talk the first 30, two years, we only take equity applicants. Or three years. I think there is a seve