Live Breaking News & Updates on Hebert Garcia|Page 5
Stay updated with breaking news from Hebert garcia. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Inconvenience i had caused this. so now mit is now the basis of mr. fran kken attack and he clas you were involved in several civil rights cases. in 1986 mr. hebert testified i have needed mr. sessions help in those cases an he has provided that help every step of the way is that correct what mr. hebert testified? yes, that s correct! in the four cases senator fran k franken right? that is correct. here is how you describe your involvement to this committee. for the cases described in two, four, eight and nine like my ....
And he had no input to the case. these represent three of the four cases that you claimed that were among the top ten cases that you personally handled. now, in your 1986 questionnaire, you used phrases like i prepared and tried the case as sole county. i was a lead prosecutor on this case assisted by so and so. why didn t you use the same level of detail in your 2016 questionnaire? in looking at this questionnaire, we decided that was an appropriate response since it was a major historic case in my office. let me just reply, senator franken, in this fashion. mr. hebert, when in 1986 when he testified at my hearing, said, ....
we have had difficulty with several u.s. attorneys in cases we have wanted to bring. we have want experienced that difficulty in the cases i have handled with mr. sessions. in fact, quite the contrary. it goes on to say i ve had occasion numerous times to ask for his assistance and guidance. i have been able to go to him, and he has had an open door poli policy, and i have taken advantage of that and found him cooperative. that is an accurate statement. i don t know, mr. rich. perhaps he handled a case that i never worked with. he goes on to say one of the cases no, you raised this question. one of the cases that you listed was a case that mr. rich handled. if you don t know him, it s hard for me to believe that you personally handled it. well, when i found that these cases, i had been supportive. filed. mr. hebert says, yet i have ....
Piece in des moines they say we can state categorically that sessions had no substantive involvement in any of them. you originally said you personally handled three of these cases, but these lawyers say that you had no substantive involvement. chairman grassley, i would ask that that op ed from last tuesday s washington post be entered into the record. without objection, it will be entered. are they distorting your record here? yes. in fact, one of the writers there, mr. hebert, spent a good bit of time in my office. he said i supported him in all the cases he brought, that i was more supportive than almost any other u.s. attorney, and that i provided office space, i signed the complaints that he brought, ....
? i m not a lawyer. i m one of the few members of this committee that didn t get to law school, and usually i get by just fine, but it seems to me a lawyer if a lawyer has just his name added to a document, e he that lawyer would be misrepresenting his record if he said he was personally handled these cases. two of the lawyers who wrote the op ed have also submitted testimony for today s hearing. mr. jerry heberth and mr. joe rich. mr. hebert said he litd gated two of the four cases you listed. he said i can state with absolute certainty that mr. sessions did not participate personally in either. mr. rich worked on one of the four cases you listed. he said, i never met him at that time nor any other time, ....